H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Mats Wilander H2H: 2-7

Mats Wilander holds a 7–2 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Mats Wilander leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1989 Cincinnati Open quarterfinal 6-0 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 7
9 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mats Wilander #4 6-0 7-6 Andres Gomez #33 Match data Aug 20, 1989* QF Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard
Andres Gomez #27 6-1 6-4 Mats Wilander #6 Match data Jul 16, 1989* F U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay
Mats Wilander #4 6-1 7-6 Andres Gomez #10 Match data May 17, 1987* QF Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Mats Wilander #3 7-5 6-4 Andres Gomez #17 Match data Feb 15, 1986* R16 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Mats Wilander #3 6-4 2-6 7-6(5) Andres Gomez #10 Match data Oct 26, 1985* QF Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet
Mats Wilander #5 6-7 6-0 6-3 Andres Gomez #14 Match data Oct 8, 1983* SF Barcelona Open ATP 250 Clay
Mats Wilander 6-2 6-1 6-2 Andres Gomez Match data Sep 8, 1983* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Andres Gomez #16 5-7 6-4 6-3 Mats Wilander #30 Match data May 23, 1982* SF Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Mats Wilander #37 6-4 6-1 Andres Gomez #20 Match data Mar 25, 1982* R32 Milan ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,263 526 203 72.2% 7 0 0 6 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,663 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 — — — — — — — 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,247 2 13
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,179 3 16
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,097 4 19
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,055 4 21
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,084 4 26
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,180 7 32
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,928 7 32
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,897 7 33
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,769 7 33
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 — — — — — — —
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,697 7 33
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,653 7 33
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,767 7 33
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,680 7 33
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 — — — — — — —
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Mats Wilander
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 18 6 24 75.0% 34 4 38 89.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 39 2 41 95.1% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 5 10 50.0%
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1984 14 2 16 87.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 7 1 8 87.5% 7 4 11 63.6%
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 13 4 17 76.5% 37 5 42 88.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5%
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 34 3 37 91.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1988 29 2 31 93.5% 17 3 20 85.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1989 8 5 13 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1990 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 5 2 7 71.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — —
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1995 14 9 23 60.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 186 71 257 72.4% 236 68 304 77.6% 45 16 61 73.8% 59 48 107 55.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 66/69 of Andres Gomez's and 107/123 of Mats Wilander's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andres Gomez Mats Wilander
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 17/19 3.1 1.3 62.5% 65.8% 50.4% 54.4% 45.3% 59.1% 34.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 9/10 3.1 2.6 61.1% 66.0% 43.5% 61.7% 36.3% 57.4% 35.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 30/37 3.1 3.0 64.0% 65.9% 46.2% 55.9% 51.7% 58.7% 38.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 35/39 3.1 2.1 68.9% 66.4% 45.9% 56.2% 48.2% 60.0% 40.0%
31 1991 37/39 5.7 2.9 56.6% 73.4% 50.8% 57.1% 46.8% 63.5% 39.3% 1996 16/18 2.3 2.1 62.9% 66.9% 46.6% 58.3% 39.9% 59.4% 41.1%
32 1992 22/22 5.8 3.9 54.4% 71.8% 47.2% 64.5% 40.1% 60.5% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 7/8 5.4 3.7 58.5% 63.7% 44.0% 57.7% 45.5% 55.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66/763 5.7 3.3 56.1% 71.8% 48.9% 59.6% 44.4% 61.6% 39.1% — 107/729 3.0 2.3 65.0% 66.2% 46.6% 56.6% 46.5% 59.2% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Mats Wilander
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1497 120.5 — — — — — +36 — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.25
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1663 137.2 — — — — +15 -79 -104 54.2% +0.25 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.23
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2020 162.4 — — — — -182 +108 -398 71.9% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 8–9 (47%) — -2.88
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2248 172.9 — — — — -208 +33 -287 78.3% +2.21 12–2 (86%) 12–11 (52%) — -4.52
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.20 1984 2180 167.5 — — — — -83 +62 -105 71.0% +1.24 13–3 (81%) 18–6 (75%) — -3.48
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.09 1985 2098 165.1 — — — — -58 +153 -23 71.8% +1.45 13–6 (68%) 12–4 (75%) — -3.35
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.54 1986 2055 160.6 — — — — +34 +96 +11 68.8% +1.29 8–3 (73%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.36
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.90 1987 2084 170.5 — — — — +5 +137 -68 73.2% +1.66 7–3 (70%) 13–11 (54%) — -4.55
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.48 1988 2180 162.6 — — — — +45 +57 -195 77.7% +1.76 12–2 (86%) 15–8 (65%) — -1.42
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) — -0.36 1989 1929 145.4 — — — — +51 +210 +61 63.3% +0.82 8–3 (73%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.07
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.07 1990 1897 152.5 — — — — +39 +195 — 59.3% +0.72 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -2.18
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.32 1991 1769 129.1 -0.51 -2.42 0.841 46.9% +151 +167 — 50.0% -0.30 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.37
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) — -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.08 1993 1697 115.7 -1.61 -1.46 0.836 47.1% +125 +183 — 37.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.40
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.82 1994 1653 131.2 -1.73 -0.29 0.920 48.7% +76 +109 — 47.5% -0.29 7–10 (41%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.64
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) — +1.72 1995 1768 148.4 -0.95 +2.28 0.999 49.9% +44 -65 +195 49.5% 0.00 9–3 (75%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.55
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +1.82 1996 1680 121.0 -1.79 +2.24 1.010 50.1% +11 +25 — 41.5% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.59
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 2263 165.2 -1.28 +0.49 0.939 48.9% -16 +94 -98 66.8% +1.13 113–55 (67%) 121–89 (58%) 105.7 -3.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.