H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Mats Wilander H2H: 2-7

Mats Wilander holds a 7–2 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Mats Wilander leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1989 Cincinnati quarterfinal 6-0 7-6.

ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 7
9 main draw meetings
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 20, 1989* Cincinnati Masters 1000 QF Hard Mats Wilander #4 6-0 7-6 Andres Gomez #33 Match data
Jul 16, 1989* Boston ATP 250 F Clay Andres Gomez #27 6-1 6-4 Mats Wilander #6 Match data
May 17, 1987* Rome Masters 1000 QF Clay Mats Wilander #4 6-1 7-6 Andres Gomez #10 Match data
Feb 15, 1986* Boca West Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mats Wilander #3 7-5 6-4 Andres Gomez #17 Match data
Oct 26, 1985* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 QF Carpet Mats Wilander #3 6-4 2-6 7-6(5) Andres Gomez #10 Match data
Oct 8, 1983* Barcelona ATP 250 SF Clay Mats Wilander #5 6-7 6-0 6-3 Andres Gomez #14 Match data
Sep 8, 1983* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mats Wilander #5 6-2 6-1 6-2 Andres Gomez #18 Match data
May 23, 1982* Rome Masters 1000 SF Clay Andres Gomez #16 5-7 6-4 6-3 Mats Wilander #30 Match data
Mar 25, 1982* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Mats Wilander #37 6-4 6-1 Andres Gomez #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,092 502 261 65.8% 1 2 0 0 18 21
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,638 0 0 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,800 0 0 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,899 0 1 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,885 0 3 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,959 0 4 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,072 0 9 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,970 0 10 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,868 0 17 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,726 1 20 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,722 1 21 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,676 1 21
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21