H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Paolo Cane H2H: 1-0

Andres Gomez holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Cane in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1986 Florence round of 16 6-1 6-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Paolo Cane
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #12 6-1 6-7 6-4 Paolo Cane #147 Match data May 23, 1986* R16 Florence ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Paolo Cane #1,381 #26 565 1,853 124 123 50.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Paolo Cane
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1983 1–4 20.0% — 1,482 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% #555 1,457 0 0
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1985 2–5 28.6% #199 1,450 0 0
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1986 23–14 62.2% #44 1,668 0 1
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1987 20–16 55.6% #51 1,706 0 1
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1988 15–18 45.5% #81 1,704 0 1
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1989 24–14 63.2% #33 1,756 0 2
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1990 15–16 48.4% #109 1,688 0 2
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1991 8–6 57.1% #122 1,688 0 3
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1992 7–10 41.2% #163 1,656 0 3
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1993 3–7 30.0% #177 1,598 0 3
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1994 6–10 37.5% #145 1,600 0 3
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1995 0–1 0.0% #635 1,583 0 3
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 — — — — — — —
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 — — — — — — —
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Paolo Cane
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1988 9 6 15 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 — — — — 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 20 21 41 48.8% 87 79 166 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 16 20 36 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Paolo Cane
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1482 102.2 — — — — +62 — — 30.8% -1.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.46
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20 1984 1457 100.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.28
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09 1985 1451 106.2 — — — — — -2 — 35.3% -0.76 0–2 0–1 — +0.43
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54 1986 1668 140.6 — — — — -133 +42 — 56.8% +0.29 13–8 (62%) 9–4 (69%) 112.3 +0.85
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90 1987 1706 138.9 — — — — -92 +43 — 51.0% +0.05 8–4 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 106.4 -0.47
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48 1988 1705 131.4 — — — — +2 -25 — 45.7% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 8–9 (47%) 98.8 -0.73
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36 1989 1756 138.8 — — — — -79 +94 — 57.8% +0.27 9–1 (90%) 9–5 (64%) 110.0 -0.63
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07 1990 1689 130.4 — — — — +19 +67 — 48.6% -0.24 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 103.9 -0.16
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32 1991 1689 122.0 +0.78 +0.31 1.049 51.3% -42 +118 — 55.9% +0.38 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 +0.45
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88 1992 1657 119.9 +0.98 -1.30 0.996 49.7% -14 +70 — 45.2% -0.12 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 95.9 +0.12
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08 1993 1599 109.2 -0.36 -0.69 0.919 48.3% +27 +55 — 38.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.8 +0.35
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82 1994 1601 126.5 -2.00 -0.22 0.884 47.5% — +49 — 36.1% -1.08 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 99.7 -0.94
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72 1995 1583 93.4 -0.27 -2.52 0.352 32.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.09
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 1854 137.8 -0.20 -0.58 0.939 48.8% -32 +51 — 49.0% -0.14 52–39 (57%) 46–43 (52%) 106.8 +0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.