H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Peter Fleming H2H: 1-1

Andres Gomez and Peter Fleming are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on carpet, while Peter Fleming leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1984 Wembley semifinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Peter Fleming
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #5 6-3 6-1 Peter Fleming #34 Match data Nov 10, 1984* SF Wembley ATP 250 Carpet
Peter Fleming #87 6-3 6-4 Andres Gomez #13 Match data Nov 4, 1983* R16 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Peter Fleming #933 #8 0 2,050 224 214 51.1% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Peter Fleming
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1973 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1975 6–7 46.2% #120 1,542 0 0
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1976 15–14 51.7% #116 1,636 0 0
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1977 31–28 52.5% #47 1,816 0 0
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1978 43–31 58.1% #26 1,955 0 1
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1979 45–26 63.4% #13 1,920 0 3
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1980 21–19 52.5% #37 1,769 0 3
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1981 9–13 40.9% #99 1,734 0 3
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1982 2–6 25.0% — 1,654 0 3
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1983 14–11 56.0% #32 1,765 0 3
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1984 18–19 48.6% #51 1,735 0 3
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1985 9–12 42.9% #94 1,686 0 3
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 1986 6–10 37.5% #103 1,657 0 3
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 1987 4–13 23.5% #174 1,561 0 3
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Peter Fleming
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1977 11 8 19 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 14 8 22 63.6%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1978 20 11 31 64.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 16 9 25 64.0%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1979 20 7 27 74.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 23 12 35 65.7%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1980 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1985 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1986 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — 1987 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 94 77 171 55.0% 22 36 58 37.9% 18 27 45 40.0% 90 74 164 54.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Peter Fleming
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1495 104.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1493 101.0 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.13
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.20 1974 1486 109.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — -0.26
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.09 1975 1542 115.0 — — — — +62 -29 — 50.0% +0.04 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.11
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.54 1976 1637 132.6 — — — — -4 -61 -52 53.7% +0.48 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — +2.59
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.90 1977 1816 148.6 — — — — +64 -251 -244 52.9% +0.24 12–15 (44%) 11–15 (42%) — -2.07
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.48 1978 1956 158.7 — — — — +60 -329 -387 55.4% +0.43 19–14 (58%) 11–15 (42%) — -4.63
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) — -0.36 1979 1920 159.8 — — — — +93 -345 -335 60.1% +0.60 10–7 (59%) 5–13 (28%) — -0.84
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.07 1980 1770 138.7 — — — — +76 -207 -83 52.3% +0.24 5–6 (45%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.13
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.32 1981 1735 139.0 — — — — +22 — -40 41.5% -0.53 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -2.84
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) — -0.88 1982 1654 112.6 — — — — +28 — — 33.3% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.08 1983 1766 140.3 — — — — +9 — -91 55.4% +0.31 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.68
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.82 1984 1735 141.3 — — — — +24 -182 — 47.9% +0.03 8–7 (53%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.15
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) — +1.72 1985 1686 134.6 — — — — +30 — — 50.9% -0.14 1–7 (13%) 5–1 (83%) — -0.10
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +1.82 1986 1657 132.9 — — — — +2 — — 41.5% -0.63 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.39 1987 1561 118.4 — — — — +12 — +36 32.6% -1.12 0–5 (0%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.55
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 2050 152.1 — — — — +50 -216 -151 51.5% +0.14 73–84 (46%) 73–84 (46%) 95.4 -1.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.