H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Victor Pecci H2H: 0-7

Victor Pecci holds a 7–0 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Victor Pecci leads 5–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Victor Pecci won the 1982 Washington Open round of 64 3-6 6-1 6-3.

ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 7
7 main-draw meetings
PAR Age 70 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victor Pecci #94 3-6 6-1 6-3 Andres Gomez #14 Match data Jul 21, 1982* R64 Washington Open ATP 250 Clay
Victor Pecci #90 6-1 6-7 7-6 Andres Gomez #14 Match data Jul 8, 1982* R32 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay
Victor Pecci #26 6-4 6-4 Andres Gomez #45 Match data Nov 29, 1980* SF Santiago ATP 250 Clay
Victor Pecci #32 6-1 6-3 Andres Gomez #48 Match data Nov 22, 1980* QF Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
Victor Pecci #13 7-6 6-4 Andres Gomez #56 Match data Jun 13, 1980* R16 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass
Victor Pecci #10 6-3 6-4 Andres Gomez #86 Match data Nov 10, 1979* SF Quito ATP 250 Clay
Victor Pecci #10 6-2 6-2 6-4 Andres Gomez Match data Sep 1, 1979* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Victor Pecci #666 #9 0 2,085 354 244 59.2% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Victor Pecci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,481 0 0
17 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,468 0 0
18 1974 2–4 33.3% #318 1,480 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1975 21–21 50.0% #55 1,702 0 0
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1976 46–29 61.3% #34 1,804 0 2
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1977 38–26 59.4% #38 1,781 0 2
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1978 30–24 55.6% #46 1,859 0 3
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1979 56–19 74.7% #11 1,994 0 6
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1980 37–20 64.9% #29 1,840 0 7
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1981 48–20 70.6% #16 1,822 0 9
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1982 19–19 50.0% #68 1,705 0 9
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1983 18–15 54.5% #56 1,721 0 10
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1984 17–12 58.6% #38 1,780 0 10
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1985 12–19 38.7% #110 1,610 0 10
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1986 4–6 40.0% #140 1,578 0 10
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 1987 6–8 42.9% #256 1,546 0 10
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Victor Pecci
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1973 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1974 2 4 6 33.3%
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1975 3 2 5 60.0% 16 17 33 48.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1976 10 5 15 66.7% 27 16 43 62.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1977 0 3 3 0.0% 38 21 59 64.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 23 13 36 63.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1979 8 3 11 72.7% 39 10 49 79.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1980 1 1 2 50.0% 26 13 39 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 1981 3 2 5 60.0% 43 16 59 72.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 14 12 26 53.8%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 2 1 3 66.7% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1986 4 6 10 40.0%
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 6 1 7 85.7% 1987 3 1 4 75.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
Career 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% 41 33 74 55.4% 274 172 446 61.4% 21 15 36 58.3% 18 24 42 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Victor Pecci
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1972 1482 98.7 0.0% -3.00 +0.10
17 1973 1469 97.7 0.0% -3.50 +0.15
18 1974 1481 115.3 +28 30.8% -0.46 1–0 0–1 +0.27
19 1979 1640 133.9 +23 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20 1975 1702 141.5 -68 -44 50.5% -0.01 6–6 (50%) 7–6 (54%) 104.2 -1.49
20 1980 1803 150.2 -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09 1976 1805 139.8 -50 -14 59.8% +0.66 13–12 (52%) 15–14 (52%) 104.7 +3.03
21 1981 1902 159.2 -233 +53 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54 1977 1782 139.3 -145 +38 56.6% +0.31 16–12 (57%) 12–10 (55%) 97.8 +5.37
22 1982 1887 151.8 -96 +44 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90 1978 1859 154.6 -233 +61 -248 56.3% +0.61 8–14 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 94.7 -1.68
23 1983 1961 152.2 -52 +15 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48 1979 1995 161.2 -286 +142 -233 68.3% +1.12 14–5 (74%) 12–11 (52%) 105.7 -2.65
24 1984 2075 162.7 -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36 1980 1840 140.1 -135 +87 -1 59.7% +0.71 11–5 (69%) 9–7 (56%) 102.6 +1.02
25 1985 1972 156.7 +24 +63 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07 1981 1822 154.3 -117 +93 64.4% +0.90 15–6 (71%) 8–8 (50%) 98.0 -1.04
26 1986 1899 151.6 +57 +84 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32 1982 1705 137.3 +2 +108 +7 50.0% +0.10 8–8 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 -1.68
27 1987 1914 153.2 +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88 1983 1721 141.2 -4 +30 56.0% +0.28 4–5 (44%) 8–2 (80%) 101.4 +0.86
28 1988 1808 143.7 -7 +174 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08 1984 1781 136.2 -63 +21 53.5% +0.11 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 105.9 +0.01
29 1989 1869 146.8 -39 +112 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82 1985 1610 138.7 +36 +76 37.3% -0.55 6–3 (67%) 3–0 (100%) -1.77
30 1990 1719 152.3 -59 +350 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72 1986 1579 116.2 +60 44.0% -0.28 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.63
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82 1987 1546 112.6 +114 +26 46.4% +0.21 1–1 1–4 (20%) +1.72
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% +122 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27
Career 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 2086 150.5 -101 +57 -119 56.8% +0.47 112–83 (57%) 94–77 (55%) 103.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.