H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andres Gomez vs Wojtek Fibak H2H: 2-1
Andres Gomez holds a 2–1 lead over Wojtek Fibak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 2–0 on carpet, while Wojtek Fibak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1984 Wembley fourth round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 66
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1984* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Andres Gomez | 7-6 6-1 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1980* | Denver | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Andres Gomez | 6-4 6-4 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
| May 27, 1979* | Munich | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Wojtek Fibak | 6-4 6-1 | Andres Gomez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,092 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andres Gomez | Wojtek Fibak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,072 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 |
| 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 |
| 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 | 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 |
| 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 | 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 |
| 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 | 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 |
| 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,868 | 0 | 17 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 |
| 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,726 | 1 | 20 | 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 |
| 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,722 | 1 | 21 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 |
| 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,676 | 1 | 21 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 |
| 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 |