H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Yannick Noah H2H: 7-1

Andres Gomez holds a 7–1 lead over Yannick Noah in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 6–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1990 Rome Masters second round 6-1 6-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Yannick Noah
FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 1990* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Andres Gomez #7 6-1 6-7 6-3 Yannick Noah #26 Match data
Jul 16, 1988* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 QF Clay Andres Gomez #20 6-3 6-3 Yannick Noah #11 Match data
May 10, 1987* Forest Hills ATP 250 F Clay Andres Gomez #12 6-4 7-6 7-6 Yannick Noah #6 Match data
Dec 1, 1986 Masters Dec ATP Finals RR Carpet Andres Gomez #10 7-6 7-6 Yannick Noah #5 Match data
Jul 22, 1985 Indianapolis ATP 250 SF Clay Andres Gomez #7 6-0 6-1 Yannick Noah #8 Match data
Apr 21, 1984* Monte Carlo ATP 250 QF Clay Yannick Noah #6 6-2 6-4 Andres Gomez #8 Match data
May 22, 1982* Rome Masters 1000 R16 Clay Andres Gomez #16 5-7 6-3 6-0 Yannick Noah #13 Match data
Jul 23, 1981* Washington ATP 250 R32 Clay Andres Gomez #71 6-3 6-2 Yannick Noah #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,092 502 261 65.8% 1 2 0 0 18 21
Yannick Noah #1,303 #3 1,079 2,196 456 194 70.2% 1 1 0 0 21 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Yannick Noah
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% #305 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 23–14 62.2% #49 1,708 0 2
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,638 0 0 1979 34–14 70.8% #26 1,931 0 5
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,800 0 0 1980 29–16 64.4% #18 1,887 0 5
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,899 0 1 1981 51–18 73.9% #13 1,915 0 7
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,885 0 3 1982 50–12 80.6% #10 2,085 0 11
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,959 0 4 1983 36–9 80.0% #5 2,085 1 14
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,072 0 9 1984 23–10 69.7% #9 1,996 1 14
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,970 0 10 1985 50–17 74.6% #7 1,954 1 17
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1986 43–14 75.4% #4 1,994 1 19
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1987 34–13 72.3% #8 1,921 1 21
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1988 32–10 76.2% #12 1,940 1 22
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,868 0 17 1989 21–14 60.0% #16 1,875 1 22
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,726 1 20 1990 22–21 51.2% #40 1,724 1 23
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,722 1 21 1991 7–7 50.0% #188 1,716 1 23
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,676 1 21 — — — — — — —
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #552 1,692 1 23
36 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,678 1 23