H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Yannick Noah H2H: 7-1

Andres Gomez holds a 7–1 lead over Yannick Noah in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 6–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1990 Italian Open round of 64 6-1 6-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Yannick Noah
FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #7 6-1 6-7 6-3 Yannick Noah #26 Match data May 16, 1990* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Andres Gomez #20 6-3 6-3 Yannick Noah #11 Match data Jul 16, 1988* QF Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Clay
Andres Gomez #12 6-4 7-6 7-6 Yannick Noah #6 Match data May 10, 1987* F Forest Hills ATP 250 Clay
Andres Gomez #10 7-6 7-6 Yannick Noah #5 Match data Dec 1, 1986 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Carpet
Andres Gomez #7 6-0 6-1 Yannick Noah #8 Match data Jul 27, 1985* SF Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay
Yannick Noah #6 6-2 6-4 Andres Gomez #8 Match data Apr 21, 1984* QF Monte-Carlo Masters ATP 250 Clay
Andres Gomez #16 5-7 6-3 6-0 Yannick Noah #13 Match data May 22, 1982* R16 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Andres Gomez #71 6-3 6-2 Yannick Noah #14 Match data Jul 23, 1981* R32 Washington Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Yannick Noah #1,303 #3 1,079 2,199 456 194 70.2% 1 0 0 1 21 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Yannick Noah
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% #269 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 23–14 62.2% #49 1,708 0 2
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1979 34–14 70.8% #26 1,933 0 5
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1980 29–16 64.4% #18 1,890 0 5
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1981 51–18 73.9% #13 1,917 0 7
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1982 50–12 80.6% #10 2,086 0 11
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1983 36–9 80.0% #5 2,087 1 14
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1984 23–10 69.7% #9 1,997 1 14
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1985 50–17 74.6% #7 1,956 1 17
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1986 43–14 75.4% #4 2,012 1 19
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1987 34–13 72.3% #8 1,951 1 21
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1988 32–10 76.2% #12 1,948 1 22
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1989 21–14 60.0% #16 1,876 1 22
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1990 22–21 51.2% #40 1,708 1 23
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 1991 7–7 50.0% #188 1,708 1 23
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 — — — — — — —
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #552 1,686 1 23
36 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,672 1 23

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Yannick Noah
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1979 13 5 18 72.2% 16 4 20 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 11 5 16 68.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 10 6 16 62.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 18 4 22 81.8%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1982 19 1 20 95.0% 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 23 2 25 92.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1985 21 7 28 75.0% 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 15 5 20 75.0% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — 11 6 17 64.7%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1987 13 2 15 86.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1988 9 3 12 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 9 2 11 81.8%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 164 62 226 72.6% 202 66 268 75.4% 11 16 27 40.7% 79 50 129 61.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 66/69 of Andres Gomez's and 18/19 of Yannick Noah's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andres Gomez Yannick Noah
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
31 1991 37/39 5.7 2.9 56.6% 73.4% 50.8% 57.1% 46.8% 63.5% 39.3% 1991 13/14 4.5 3.5 55.5% 68.0% 44.8% 62.6% 47.2% 57.6% 36.6%
32 1992 22/22 5.8 3.9 54.4% 71.8% 47.2% 64.5% 40.1% 60.5% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 7/8 5.4 3.7 58.5% 63.7% 44.0% 57.7% 45.5% 55.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 4/4 4.0 1.8 55.4% 77.9% 47.6% 45.5% 20.0% 64.1% 29.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 1/1 7.0 2.0 60.5% 69.2% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 61.6% 19.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Yannick Noah
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1491 103.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.00 0–1 2–0 — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1709 137.9 — — — — -111 +56 -173 57.7% +0.42 7–5 (58%) 10–6 (63%) — +3.56
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.20 1979 1933 150.7 — — — — -105 +27 -371 65.1% +1.08 9–4 (69%) 10–9 (53%) — +0.67
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.09 1980 1890 153.0 — — — — +5 +91 -340 59.5% +0.98 9–6 (60%) 6–8 (43%) — -3.05
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.54 1981 1917 156.5 — — — — +62 +116 -384 64.4% +1.04 17–4 (81%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.67
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.90 1982 2086 164.7 — — — — -20 +30 — 74.0% +1.55 12–5 (71%) 9–6 (60%) — -3.56
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.48 1983 2087 162.3 — — — — -135 +184 — 74.8% +1.72 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) — -1.85
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) — -0.36 1984 1998 159.6 — — — — -11 +206 — 65.9% +0.83 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) — -2.14
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.07 1985 1957 156.2 — — — — -10 +205 -368 68.4% +1.11 12–6 (67%) 18–12 (60%) — -0.87
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.32 1986 2013 163.9 — — — — -41 +208 — 67.8% +1.19 13–5 (72%) 12–17 (41%) — -2.21
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) — -0.88 1987 1951 147.7 — — — — +93 +140 -296 65.0% +1.00 11–4 (73%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.55
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.08 1988 1949 153.8 — — — — +75 +116 — 67.2% +1.03 12–4 (75%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.74
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.82 1989 1877 147.3 — — — — +46 — — 56.2% +0.40 10–4 (71%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.89
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) — +1.72 1990 1708 139.1 — — — — +109 +162 — 49.1% -0.16 8–6 (57%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.00
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +1.82 1991 1709 127.3 -0.35 -2.54 0.863 47.8% +60 +151 — 48.5% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.03
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1686 117.0 -0.18 -0.05 0.814 46.1% +61 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 1–1 — -0.54
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1672 104.2 -2.25 +2.64 0.506 43.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.10
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 2199 161.2 -0.42 -1.70 0.835 47.2% +9 +121 -314 64.2% +0.93 138–68 (67%) 139–119 (54%) 101.7 -2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.