H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Andrew Ilie vs David Prinosil H2H: 0-1

David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Andrew Ilie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1999 Moscow round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrew Ilie
AUS Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Prinosil #64 6-3 6-2 Andrew Ilie #56 Match data Nov 11, 1999* R32 Moscow ATP 250 Carpet

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrew Ilie #856 #38 997 1,738 89 115 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrew Ilie David Prinosil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1995 5–5 50.0% #161 1,551 0 0 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0
20 1996 1–3 25.0% #346 1,540 0 0 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0
22 1998 14–14 50.0% #59 1,587 0 1 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1999 28–29 49.1% #54 1,638 0 1 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2
24 2000 21–27 43.8% #50 1,591 0 2 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2
25 2001 20–28 41.7% #66 1,620 0 2 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2
26 2002 0–7 0.0% #464 1,500 0 2 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2
27 2003 0–2 0.0% #384 1,456 0 2 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrew Ilie David Prinosil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1999 18 15 33 54.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 2000 7 18 25 28.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0%
25 2001 11 15 26 42.3% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
26 2002 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 41 64 105 39.0% 42 35 77 54.5% 5 11 16 31.2% 1 5 6 16.7% — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 172/204 of Andrew Ilie's and 337/375 of David Prinosil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrew Ilie David Prinosil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1995 7/10 3.6 4.4 54.0% 63.9% 51.5% 60.4% 34.1% 58.2% 37.9% 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8%
20 1996 4/4 3.5 4.3 51.6% 68.5% 44.3% 68.4% 33.4% 57.1% 39.9% 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1%
22 1998 25/28 3.8 3.4 49.8% 70.9% 51.6% 57.8% 44.9% 61.2% 36.6% 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1%
23 1999 50/57 4.6 3.2 54.8% 68.1% 51.6% 60.3% 40.2% 60.7% 36.3% 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6%
24 2000 41/48 5.8 3.5 52.8% 70.0% 49.0% 56.3% 36.5% 59.9% 37.3% 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0%
25 2001 38/48 4.8 3.1 56.3% 68.1% 49.7% 53.6% 38.7% 59.8% 34.5% 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7%
26 2002 5/7 3.4 4.8 57.3% 65.0% 40.5% 51.3% 16.2% 54.7% 33.3% 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1%
27 2003 2/2 7.0 4.0 59.3% 63.1% 33.3% 21.4% 20.0% 50.9% 25.0% 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8%
Career — 172/204 4.7 3.4 53.9% 68.6% 49.8% 57.0% 38.3% 59.9% 36.1% — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrew Ilie David Prinosil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
19 1995 1552 112.5 -0.36 -0.54 0.906 48.1% — +56 — 46.7% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) +0.71 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) +1.60
20 1996 1541 104.9 +0.54 -0.28 0.931 49.0% — — — 33.3% -1.25 0–1 2–1 (67%) -0.29 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +21 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) -2.01
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) +0.64
22 1998 1587 129.4 +0.09 -1.09 0.944 49.1% -70 +132 — 50.7% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) +0.43 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) +0.33
23 1999 1638 126.6 -1.25 -1.32 0.922 48.8% +2 +7 -9 48.0% -0.28 12–8 (60%) 8–8 (50%) +2.44 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) -1.27
24 2000 1592 130.9 -1.56 -0.90 0.931 48.9% -49 +204 -39 48.3% -0.32 5–10 (33%) 13–9 (59%) -0.25 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) -1.03
25 2001 1621 131.7 -1.47 -2.30 0.859 47.6% -4 +65 — 43.0% -0.56 10–9 (53%) 11–10 (52%) -1.24 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) -0.14
26 2002 1501 90.4 -3.88 -1.57 0.735 44.2% +40 — — 5.9% -3.12 — 1–2 (33%) +0.68 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -10 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) +0.36
27 2003 1456 95.5 -2.41 -1.74 0.509 37.7% — — — 16.7% -2.17 — 0–1 +0.17 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +77 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) -0.27
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) -1.97
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 -0.19
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 -0.15
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — -0.15
Career — 1739 129.5 -1.19 -1.36 0.901 48.3% -21 +97 -17 45.1% -0.47 33–33 (50%) 40–37 (52%) +1.31 — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) -1.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.