H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andrew Ilie vs Galo Blanco H2H: 1-1
Andrew Ilie and Galo Blanco are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Galo Blanco leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrew Ilie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Galo Blanco won the 2001 Kitzbuhel second round 7-6(7) 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2001* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Galo Blanco | 7-6(7) 7-6(8) | Andrew Ilie | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1999* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Andrew Ilie | 6-3 6-4 | Galo Blanco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Ilie | #856 | #38 | 997 | 1,739 | 89 | 114 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrew Ilie | Galo Blanco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #346 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #50 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #66 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #464 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #384 | 1,457 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |