H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrew Ilie vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 0-1
Markus Hipfl holds a 1–0 lead over Andrew Ilie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Markus Hipfl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Markus Hipfl won the 1999 US Open first round 6-4 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Markus Hipfl | 6-4 6-1 6-2 | Andrew Ilie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Ilie | #856 | #38 | 997 | 1,739 | 89 | 114 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrew Ilie | Markus Hipfl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #346 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #50 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #66 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #464 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #384 | 1,457 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |