H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Andrew Ilie vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-0

Andrew Ilie holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrew Ilie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrew Ilie won the 1999 Canadian Open round of 64 6-4 7-6(8).

AUS Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrew Ilie #54 6-4 7-6(8) Martin Damm Sr Match data Aug 4, 1999* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrew Ilie #856 #38 997 1,739 89 115 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Martin Damm Sr 1,731 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Andrew Ilie Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1995 5–5 50.0% #161 1,551 0 0
1996 1–3 25.0% #346 1,540 0 0
1998 14–14 50.0% #59 1,587 0 1
1999 28–29 49.1% #54 1,638 0 1
2000 21–27 43.8% #50 1,591 0 2
2001 20–28 41.7% #66 1,620 0 2
2002 0–7 0.0% #464 1,500 0 2
2003 0–2 0.0% #384 1,456 0 2

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Andrew Ilie Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1995 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
1998 5 8 13 38.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 2 1 3 66.7%
1999 18 15 33 54.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
2000 7 18 25 28.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
2001 11 15 26 42.3% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
2002 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
2003 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
2002 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 41 64 105 39.0% 42 35 77 54.5% 5 11 16 31.2% 1 5 6 16.7% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Andrew Ilie Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1995 1552 112.5 -0.36 -0.54 0.906 48.1% +56 46.7% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.53 1989 1492 98.3 0.0% -5.00 -0.08
1996 1541 104.9 +0.54 -0.28 0.931 49.0% 33.3% -1.25 0–1 2–1 (67%) -0.31 1990 1478 98.3 0.0% -2.50 +0.15
1998 1587 129.4 +0.09 -1.09 0.944 49.1% -70 +132 50.7% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 101.3 +0.29 1991 1504 104.7 +57 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 +0.21
1999 1638 126.6 -1.25 -1.32 0.922 48.8% +2 +8 -9 48.0% -0.28 12–8 (60%) 8–8 (50%) 103.8 +2.44 1992 1546 125.4 +65 -88 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
2000 1592 130.9 -1.56 -0.90 0.931 48.9% -49 +205 -39 48.3% -0.32 5–10 (33%) 13–9 (59%) 99.0 -0.35 1993 1647 128.4 +28 -196 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
2001 1621 131.7 -1.47 -2.30 0.859 47.6% -4 +65 43.0% -0.56 10–9 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 102.2 -1.52 1994 1630 133.5 -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
2002 1501 90.4 -3.88 -1.57 0.735 44.2% +40 5.9% -3.12 1–2 (33%) +0.68 1995 1619 133.0 +8 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
2003 1456 95.5 -2.41 -1.74 0.509 37.7% 16.7% -2.17 0–1 +0.16 1996 1709 139.5 +35 -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
1997 1694 135.4 +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
1998 1649 132.2 +16 +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
1999 1578 123.5 +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
2000 1615 127.5 -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
2001 1514 96.3 +91 15.0% -1.90 0–2 +0.77
2002 1525 111.4 +15 37.5% -0.75 1–1 -0.13
Career 1739 129.5 -1.19 -1.36 0.901 48.3% -21 +97 -17 45.1% -0.47 33–33 (50%) 40–37 (52%) 103.7 +0.95 Career 1732 136.6 +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.