H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Andrew Ilie vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 0-1

Sargis Sargsian holds a 1–0 lead over Andrew Ilie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2000 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-7(5) 6-2 5-0 RET.

AUS Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sargis Sargsian #78 6-7(5) 6-2 5-0 (ret.) Andrew Ilie #41 Match data Jun 22, 2000* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrew Ilie #856 #38 997 1,738 89 115 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 156 208 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrew Ilie Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1995 5–5 50.0% #161 1,551 0 0
20 1996 1–3 25.0% #346 1,540 0 0 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
22 1998 14–14 50.0% #59 1,587 0 1 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1999 28–29 49.1% #54 1,638 0 1 1996 4–6 40.0% #104 1,576 0 0
24 2000 21–27 43.8% #50 1,591 0 2 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,627 0 1
25 2001 20–28 41.7% #66 1,620 0 2 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,617 0 1
26 2002 0–7 0.0% #464 1,500 0 2 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,636 0 1
27 2003 0–2 0.0% #384 1,456 0 2 2000 15–26 36.6% #94 1,566 0 1
28 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,624 0 1
29 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,649 0 1
30 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2004 17–27 38.6% #75 1,696 0 1
32 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,589 0 1
33 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrew Ilie Sargis Sargsian
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1999 18 15 33 54.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2000 7 18 25 28.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 2001 11 15 26 42.3% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2002 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 6 12 18 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2001 7 10 17 41.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
29 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
31 2004 9 14 23 39.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
32 2005 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 2006 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 41 64 105 39.0% 42 35 77 54.5% 5 11 16 31.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 68 103 171 39.8% 45 58 103 43.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 15 17 32 46.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 172/204 of Andrew Ilie's and 313/364 of Sargis Sargsian's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrew Ilie Sargis Sargsian
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1995 7/10 3.6 4.4 54.0% 63.9% 51.5% 60.4% 34.1% 58.2% 37.9% —/—
20 1996 4/4 3.5 4.3 51.6% 68.5% 44.3% 68.4% 33.4% 57.1% 39.9% 1993 2/2 1.0 3.0 62.4% 56.6% 57.6% 68.3% 34.5% 57.6% 36.0%
22 1998 25/28 3.8 3.4 49.8% 70.9% 51.6% 57.8% 44.9% 61.2% 36.6% 1995 2/4 5.0 7.0 57.5% 78.7% 29.9% 46.7% 47.4% 58.4% 33.4%
23 1999 50/57 4.6 3.2 54.8% 68.1% 51.6% 60.3% 40.2% 60.7% 36.3% 1996 7/10 2.1 4.0 58.5% 69.3% 46.1% 51.7% 41.0% 60.0% 42.4%
24 2000 41/48 5.8 3.5 52.8% 70.0% 49.0% 56.3% 36.5% 59.9% 37.3% 1997 31/41 4.3 3.4 58.0% 66.1% 50.7% 54.6% 38.3% 59.6% 35.6%
25 2001 38/48 4.8 3.1 56.3% 68.1% 49.7% 53.6% 38.7% 59.8% 34.5% 1998 33/43 4.5 3.1 60.5% 71.0% 50.9% 61.1% 43.1% 63.0% 38.8%
26 2002 5/7 3.4 4.8 57.3% 65.0% 40.5% 51.3% 16.2% 54.7% 33.3% 1999 33/44 3.8 2.5 60.7% 70.1% 50.3% 68.4% 40.9% 62.0% 39.0%
27 2003 2/2 7.0 4.0 59.3% 63.1% 33.3% 21.4% 20.0% 50.9% 25.0% 2000 33/41 3.7 3.0 60.4% 66.5% 45.5% 55.1% 39.0% 58.0% 38.0%
28 —/— 2001 32/35 3.7 3.3 59.1% 68.7% 48.5% 54.0% 46.3% 60.2% 38.1%
29 —/— 2002 29/32 5.0 3.2 56.7% 67.3% 49.4% 51.7% 39.2% 59.6% 34.2%
30 —/— 2003 54/54 4.1 3.4 61.7% 69.5% 51.8% 57.0% 47.3% 62.8% 39.6%
31 —/— 2004 43/44 4.8 3.0 63.2% 67.8% 48.6% 52.9% 33.9% 60.3% 36.8%
32 —/— 2005 12/12 3.0 4.3 59.9% 56.7% 37.4% 46.5% 49.0% 48.7% 30.9%
33 —/— 2006 2/2 0.5 6.5 60.0% 56.3% 39.5% 57.7% 16.7% 49.5% 28.9%
Career 172/204 4.7 3.4 53.9% 68.6% 49.8% 57.0% 38.3% 59.9% 36.1% 313/364 4.1 3.2 60.3% 67.9% 48.9% 56.3% 41.4% 60.3% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrew Ilie Sargis Sargsian
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
19 1995 1552 112.5 -0.36 -0.54 0.906 48.1% +56 46.7% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) +0.71
20 1996 1541 104.9 +0.54 -0.28 0.931 49.0% 33.3% -1.25 0–1 2–1 (67%) -0.29 1993 1514 106.3 -1.99 -0.78 0.850 47.7% 40.0% -0.20 1–0 1–1 -0.10
22 1998 1587 129.4 +0.09 -1.09 0.944 49.1% -70 +132 50.7% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) +0.43 1995 1568 112.7 -0.77 +0.75 0.802 46.7% +23 40.0% -0.73 2–0 1–0 -0.16
23 1999 1638 126.6 -1.25 -1.32 0.922 48.8% +2 +7 -9 48.0% -0.28 12–8 (60%) 8–8 (50%) +2.44 1996 1577 128.3 -1.13 +3.09 1.060 51.0% +44 45.5% 0.00 0–2 0–2 +0.38
24 2000 1592 130.9 -1.56 -0.90 0.931 48.9% -49 +204 -39 48.3% -0.32 5–10 (33%) 13–9 (59%) -0.25 1997 1628 125.8 -1.73 -0.98 0.881 47.6% -2 -131 +80 42.7% -0.72 7–9 (44%) 10–6 (63%) -0.23
25 2001 1621 131.7 -1.47 -2.30 0.859 47.6% -4 +65 43.0% -0.56 10–9 (53%) 11–10 (52%) -1.24 1998 1617 121.9 +0.65 +0.48 1.050 50.9% -61 -74 +115 46.4% -0.07 6–11 (35%) 8–12 (40%) +1.69
26 2002 1501 90.4 -3.88 -1.57 0.735 44.2% +40 5.9% -3.12 1–2 (33%) +0.68 1999 1637 132.5 +0.09 +1.23 1.029 50.7% -86 +41 +71 49.1% -0.06 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) -0.38
27 2003 1456 95.5 -2.41 -1.74 0.509 37.7% 16.7% -2.17 0–1 +0.17 2000 1566 128.7 -2.68 +0.64 0.906 47.9% -41 +99 +90 37.0% -0.66 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +1.17
28 2001 1625 130.0 -2.01 +0.60 0.956 49.3% -63 +51 +50 46.7% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) +0.51
29 2002 1650 127.4 -1.35 -1.75 0.846 47.0% -4 -26 -15 41.7% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) -0.82
30 2003 1774 142.7 +1.40 +2.44 1.066 51.2% -2 -111 -141 53.7% +0.49 4–6 (40%) 4–8 (33%) -1.84
31 2004 1697 135.9 -1.71 +0.83 0.929 48.5% +25 -58 -94 40.7% -0.52 8–6 (57%) 8–6 (57%) -2.23
32 2005 1589 91.9 -8.24 -4.38 0.602 40.3% +84 +23 -62 22.2% -2.26 1–0 1–2 (33%) +0.28
33 2006 1577 106.8 -0.31 -1.11 0.571 39.8% 0.0% -3.75 -0.37
Career 1739 129.5 -1.19 -1.36 0.901 48.3% -21 +97 -17 45.1% -0.47 33–33 (50%) 40–37 (52%) +1.31 1812 135.5 -1.06 +0.48 0.943 48.9% -14 -12 +32 44.2% -0.34 49–64 (43%) 60–59 (50%) -0.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.