H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andrey Golubev vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 1-0
Andrey Golubev holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio Zeballos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrey Golubev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Golubev won the 2013 Moscow fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2013* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrey Golubev | 6-3 6-4 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Golubev | #1,694 | #33 | 1,210 | 1,781 | 51 | 107 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Golubev | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #147 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #74 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #206 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |