H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrey Golubev vs Igor Sijsling H2H: 0-1
Igor Sijsling holds a 1–0 lead over Andrey Golubev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Sijsling leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Sijsling won the 2014 Winston-Salem second round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 38
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2016 | Munich | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Igor Sijsling | 6-2 6-1 | Andrey Golubev | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2014* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Igor Sijsling | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Andrey Golubev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Golubev | #1,694 | #33 | 1,210 | 1,781 | 51 | 107 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Igor Sijsling | #854 | #52 | 910 | 1,794 | 44 | 84 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Golubev | Igor Sijsling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #147 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #74 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #206 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #145 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |