H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:16 UTC
Andrey Kuznetsov vs Igor Sijsling H2H: 2-0
Andrey Kuznetsov holds a 2–0 lead over Igor Sijsling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrey Kuznetsov leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Kuznetsov won the 2014 Zagreb fourth round 1-6 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 38
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2014* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrey Kuznetsov | 1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | Igor Sijsling | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2013* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Andrey Kuznetsov | 6-1 6-3 | Igor Sijsling | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Kuznetsov | #1,435 | #39 | 1,093 | 1,952 | 72 | 100 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Igor Sijsling | #854 | #52 | 910 | 1,794 | 44 | 84 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Kuznetsov | Igor Sijsling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #301 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,899 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #107 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #145 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1369 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |