H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Borna Coric H2H: 3-0
Andrey Rublev holds a 3–0 lead over Borna Coric in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrey Rublev leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2020 St Petersburg final 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2020* | St Petersburg | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Borna Coric | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2019* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 7-6(4) | Borna Coric | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2018* | Doha | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-3 7-5 | Borna Coric | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Borna Coric | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |