H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Carlos Berlocq H2H: 1-0
Andrey Rublev holds a 1–0 lead over Carlos Berlocq in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2017 Umag third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2017* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrey Rublev | 6-2 6-4 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2017* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Carlos Berlocq | 6-2 6-3 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 373 | 212 | 63.8% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Carlos Berlocq | #505 | #37 | 1,086 | 1,853 | 127 | 186 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Carlos Berlocq | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #79 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #132 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #85 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2008 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #157 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #16 | 1,883 | 0 | 17 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #60 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #66 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #41 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,504 | 0 | 2 |