H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 2-1
Andrey Rublev holds a 2–1 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2018 Doha fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 42
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2018* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2017* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Fernando Verdasco | 7-6(1) 7-6(6) | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2015* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Andrey Rublev | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,125 | 549 | 441 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | 2012 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 |