H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Hyeon Chung H2H: 1-1
Andrey Rublev and Hyeon Chung are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2019 Vienna fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
South Korea
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2019* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 6-2 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2017* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hyeon Chung | 5-7 6-1 6-1 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 373 | 212 | 63.8% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Hyeon Chung | #493 | #19 | 1,897 | 2,022 | 71 | 67 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrey Rublev | Hyeon Chung | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #104 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #25 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #128 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #16 | 1,883 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |