H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Andrey Rublev vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 1-0

Andrey Rublev holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2017 Croatia Open Umag semifinal 7-6(4) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrey Rublev
Russia Age 28 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Ivan Dodig
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrey Rublev #74 7-6(4) 6-1 Ivan Dodig #412 Match data Jul 22, 2017* SF Croatia Open Umag ATP 250 Clay
Ivan Dodig #106 4-6 6-4 6-4 Andrey Rublev #207 Match data Jun 30, 2015* Q2 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrey Rublev #24 #5 6,400 2,175 377 216 63.6% 0 2 0 6 10 18
Ivan Dodig #423 #29 1,330 1,966 115 132 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrey Rublev Ivan Dodig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 0–1 0.0% #437 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 6–11 35.3% #185 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 2–5 28.6% #156 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 18–15 54.5% #39 1,835 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2018 17–20 45.9% #68 1,752 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2019 34–19 64.2% #23 1,975 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2020 41–10 80.4% #8 2,134 0 7 — — — — — — —
23 2021 46–22 67.6% #5 1,959 0 8 2008 0–1 0.0% #422 1,508 0 0
24 2022 51–20 71.8% #8 2,033 0 12 2009 2–2 50.0% #180 1,546 0 0
25 2023 56–25 69.1% #5 2,052 0 14 2010 7–7 50.0% #88 1,724 0 0
26 2024 43–27 61.4% #8 1,883 0 16 2011 26–23 53.1% #36 1,776 0 1
27 2025 36–25 59.0% #16 1,846 0 17 2012 15–22 40.5% #72 1,783 0 1
28 2026 27–16 62.8% #24 1,859 0 18 2013 32–24 57.1% #33 1,918 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2014 15–23 39.5% #95 1,758 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2015 8–11 42.1% #87 1,668 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2016 7–16 30.4% #147 1,571 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #336 1,607 0 1
40 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrey Rublev Ivan Dodig
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 10 11 21 47.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 15 17 32 46.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 28 15 43 65.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 31 8 39 79.5% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 30 15 45 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2022 37 13 50 74.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2023 29 18 47 61.7% 19 5 24 79.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 2010 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2024 32 19 51 62.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 17 14 31 54.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2025 22 17 39 56.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
28 2026 12 8 20 60.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 20 16 36 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 11 17 28 39.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 10 12 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 251 151 402 62.4% 103 51 154 66.9% 23 14 37 62.2% — 73 85 158 46.2% 25 32 57 43.9% 17 15 32 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 586/594 of Andrey Rublev's and 245/246 of Ivan Dodig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrey Rublev Ivan Dodig
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 1/1 4.0 0.0 63.4% 77.8% 57.7% 75.0% 0.0% 70.4% 25.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 17/17 4.0 3.0 63.3% 68.0% 49.8% 51.1% 38.7% 60.9% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 7/7 2.3 2.9 60.3% 66.3% 50.7% 50.3% 35.3% 60.0% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 33/33 5.1 3.8 57.1% 70.3% 49.3% 53.5% 42.7% 61.0% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 36/37 5.4 5.1 59.2% 74.8% 45.4% 61.7% 41.3% 62.3% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 53/53 6.1 3.1 58.8% 73.8% 51.4% 59.6% 44.4% 64.7% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 51/51 8.1 1.5 60.0% 80.3% 55.2% 60.5% 49.5% 70.2% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 65/68 7.4 1.9 60.8% 77.0% 51.8% 61.9% 45.8% 67.2% 39.1% 2008 1/1 1.0 0.0 56.6% 70.0% 34.8% 40.0% — 54.7% 24.5%
24 2022 71/71 7.9 2.1 62.4% 77.0% 52.0% 64.3% 41.9% 67.3% 38.5% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.5 52.2% 69.3% 49.8% 56.0% 53.8% 59.6% 36.0%
25 2023 81/81 7.8 2.0 61.7% 75.8% 51.3% 62.2% 42.0% 66.4% 38.3% 2010 14/14 8.6 3.2 57.0% 73.5% 52.2% 55.5% 51.3% 64.5% 39.5%
26 2024 69/70 8.4 2.6 62.3% 77.0% 54.7% 65.0% 39.4% 68.7% 37.1% 2011 49/49 7.6 3.1 58.3% 70.5% 49.5% 58.8% 40.1% 61.9% 35.9%
27 2025 59/61 8.1 3.0 60.1% 77.2% 51.6% 59.6% 40.5% 66.8% 37.1% 2012 36/37 8.2 3.5 57.4% 72.1% 47.9% 59.4% 35.2% 61.7% 37.0%
28 2026 43/44 7.3 2.8 62.4% 73.8% 52.2% 62.3% 37.9% 66.0% 38.3% 2013 56/56 9.3 3.0 58.6% 75.1% 54.1% 61.4% 45.5% 66.5% 38.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 38/38 8.5 3.4 57.9% 74.4% 49.5% 57.5% 42.1% 63.9% 35.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 19/19 8.7 3.0 59.4% 74.5% 53.9% 57.0% 45.5% 66.3% 37.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 23/23 8.0 3.6 59.8% 69.3% 48.5% 59.3% 47.9% 60.9% 33.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 5/5 5.4 5.8 62.0% 70.2% 44.5% 53.9% 34.3% 60.7% 39.9%
Career — 586/594 7.2 2.6 60.9% 75.7% 51.8% 61.1% 42.3% 66.3% 38.4% — 245/247 8.3 3.3 58.3% 72.8% 50.6% 58.8% 42.6% 63.5% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrey Rublev Ivan Dodig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2013 1483 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2014 1476 101.1 -4.42 +4.03 0.868 47.6% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1640 136.5 -2.17 -0.98 0.884 47.9% -34 -31 — 40.9% -0.61 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1548 108.1 -1.05 -2.59 0.831 46.6% -7 — — 21.4% -1.86 1–1 0–1 — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1836 142.7 -0.72 +1.86 0.982 49.6% -71 -153 -136 52.2% +0.02 7–4 (64%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 1752 155.3 -1.25 +2.58 1.049 50.6% -6 -75 — 44.3% -0.09 5–3 (63%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 1975 157.5 +0.70 +3.55 1.120 51.8% +2 -200 — 57.4% +0.53 12–4 (75%) 12–13 (48%) — -2.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 2135 168.1 +5.94 +4.57 1.386 54.8% -36 -208 — 72.1% +1.38 7–4 (64%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.29 2007 1495 106.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 1959 166.5 +4.06 +3.24 1.195 52.7% +29 +6 -139 63.7% +0.88 10–10 (50%) 14–15 (48%) — +0.66 2008 1509 106.8 +4.34 +3.57 0.541 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.29
24 2022 2034 165.8 +3.42 +2.72 1.178 52.4% +41 -14 — 64.3% +0.85 17–6 (74%) 15–10 (60%) — +2.62 2009 1546 117.4 -1.85 +0.71 0.891 48.0% +60 — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.48
25 2023 2053 171.1 +3.18 +2.82 1.140 52.2% +18 +54 -47 64.1% +0.90 14–11 (56%) 19–17 (53%) — -0.85 2010 1724 125.3 +0.48 +1.37 1.113 52.2% +20 — — 52.9% +0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
26 2024 1883 158.4 +4.26 +1.82 1.183 52.4% +39 +119 — 58.9% +0.70 14–8 (64%) 14–20 (41%) — +4.67 2011 1777 150.6 -0.35 -0.75 0.941 49.0% +49 -206 -91 49.6% -0.25 12–4 (75%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.33
27 2025 1847 150.1 +2.41 +1.68 1.115 51.6% -2 +81 +80 55.6% +0.41 9–10 (47%) 18–12 (60%) — +3.51 2012 1784 142.5 -1.17 -0.16 0.965 49.4% +59 -235 -120 40.4% -0.53 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.32
28 2026 1859 152.3 +1.73 +2.11 1.127 51.8% -10 +123 — 59.5% +0.67 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) — +0.72 2013 1919 160.6 +2.92 +2.62 1.146 52.4% -16 -288 -73 54.7% +0.35 8–10 (44%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.81
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1758 150.7 -0.20 -0.49 0.977 49.6% -2 -88 — 44.6% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.01
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1668 137.9 +1.03 +1.07 1.123 51.4% +16 -3 — 47.9% +0.08 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.31
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1572 126.0 -1.95 -1.62 0.867 47.8% -29 +124 +224 40.7% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1607 117.9 -1.14 +0.70 1.014 50.1% — +110 — 53.8% -0.15 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1593 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1573 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.39
Career — 2176 163.8 +2.56 +2.55 1.139 52.0% +6 +8 -64 59.3% +0.63 107–73 (59%) 131–137 (49%) 99.0 +1.32 — 1967 146.6 +0.28 +0.40 1.007 50.2% +16 -119 -48 47.8% -0.12 39–39 (50%) 56–50 (53%) 103.4 -1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.