H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 16:33 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Jesper de Jong H2H: 2-0
Andrey Rublev holds a 2–0 lead over Jesper de Jong in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2026 Qatar ExxonMobil Open third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 26
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2026 | Qatar ExxonMobil Open | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 6-3 | Jesper de Jong | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2025* | Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Andrey Rublev | 6-1 6-3 | Jesper de Jong | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Jesper de Jong | #73 | #71 | 821 | 1,766 | 24 | 32 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Jesper de Jong | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2024 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #112 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2025 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2026 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #73 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |