H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Kevin Anderson H2H: 2-1
Andrey Rublev holds a 2–1 lead over Kevin Anderson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2020 Vienna semifinal 6-4 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 40
Right-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2020* | Vienna | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 4-1 (ret.) | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Andrey Rublev | 6-3 6-2 6-3 | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kevin Anderson | 7-6(1) 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Kevin Anderson | #1,151 | #5 | 4,845 | 2,142 | 347 | 251 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Kevin Anderson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #61 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2011 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #32 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2012 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #37 | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2013 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | 2014 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,958 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #12 | 2,046 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #67 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #14 | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 2,123 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #91 | 2,057 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #81 | 1,964 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #104 | 1,681 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #627 | 1,669 | 0 | 7 |