H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Lloyd Harris H2H: 4-0
Andrey Rublev holds a 4–0 lead over Lloyd Harris in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrey Rublev leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2025 Wimbledon second round 6-7 6-4 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
South Africa
Age 29
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2025* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Andrey Rublev | 6-7 6-4 7-6 6-3 | Lloyd Harris | Match data |
| May 27, 2025* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Lloyd Harris | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Andrey Rublev | 6-1 6-2 7-5 | Lloyd Harris | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2020* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-3 6-0 | Lloyd Harris | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Lloyd Harris | #187 | #31 | 1,758 | 1,938 | 64 | 79 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Lloyd Harris | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #87 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #31 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2022 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #237 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #140 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2024 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #222 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |