H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Andrey Rublev holds a 3–0 lead over Lucas Pouille in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrey Rublev leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2022 Marseille quarterfinal 6-3 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | Lucas Pouille | Match data | Feb 19, 2022* | QF | Marseille | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Andrey Rublev | 6-2 6-3 | Lucas Pouille | Match data | Jan 10, 2019* | R32 | Sydney International | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Andrey Rublev | 7-5 6-4 | Lucas Pouille | Match data | Feb 15, 2018* | R32 | ABN AMRO Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #24 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,175 | 377 | 216 | 63.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 18 |
| Lucas Pouille | #583 | #10 | 2,746 | 2,034 | 137 | 131 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Lucas Pouille | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #204 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #15 | 2,015 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #5 | 1,959 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #18 | 1,954 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,033 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #32 | 1,805 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,052 | 0 | 14 | 2019 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #22 | 1,873 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 17 | 2021 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2026 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #24 | 1,859 | 0 | 18 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #330 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Lucas Pouille | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2013 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 2018 | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 28 | 15 | 43 | 65.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2015 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 31 | 8 | 39 | 79.5% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 23 | 2021 | 30 | 15 | 45 | 66.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2017 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 37 | 13 | 50 | 74.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2018 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2023 | 29 | 18 | 47 | 61.7% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2019 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 26 | 2024 | 32 | 19 | 51 | 62.7% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 22 | 17 | 39 | 56.4% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2021 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2026 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2022 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 251 | 151 | 402 | 62.4% | 103 | 51 | 154 | 66.9% | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | — | 81 | 77 | 158 | 51.3% | 36 | 38 | 74 | 48.6% | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 586/594 of Andrey Rublev's and 266/268 of Lucas Pouille's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Lucas Pouille | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 63.4% | 77.8% | 57.7% | 75.0% | 0.0% | 70.4% | 25.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 17/17 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 63.3% | 68.0% | 49.8% | 51.1% | 38.7% | 60.9% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 7/7 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 60.3% | 66.3% | 50.7% | 50.3% | 35.3% | 60.0% | 33.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 33/33 | 5.1 | 3.8 | 57.1% | 70.3% | 49.3% | 53.5% | 42.7% | 61.0% | 38.3% | 2013 | 5/5 | 5.8 | 3.6 | 53.8% | 65.3% | 52.7% | 68.3% | 29.7% | 59.6% | 29.8% |
| 20 | 2018 | 36/37 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 59.2% | 74.8% | 45.4% | 61.7% | 41.3% | 62.3% | 39.5% | 2014 | 6/6 | 4.8 | 3.2 | 59.2% | 67.3% | 44.2% | 57.8% | 54.2% | 58.0% | 38.3% |
| 21 | 2019 | 53/53 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 58.8% | 73.8% | 51.4% | 59.6% | 44.4% | 64.7% | 39.6% | 2015 | 26/26 | 4.9 | 3.3 | 55.0% | 69.5% | 51.0% | 61.6% | 37.6% | 61.1% | 35.5% |
| 22 | 2020 | 51/51 | 8.1 | 1.5 | 60.0% | 80.3% | 55.2% | 60.5% | 49.5% | 70.2% | 41.3% | 2016 | 53/54 | 8.5 | 3.6 | 54.9% | 73.9% | 50.7% | 59.6% | 46.1% | 63.5% | 35.4% |
| 23 | 2021 | 65/68 | 7.4 | 1.9 | 60.8% | 77.0% | 51.8% | 61.9% | 45.8% | 67.2% | 39.1% | 2017 | 54/54 | 8.5 | 4.0 | 56.3% | 75.5% | 54.0% | 65.0% | 46.2% | 66.1% | 37.6% |
| 24 | 2022 | 71/71 | 7.9 | 2.1 | 62.4% | 77.0% | 52.0% | 64.3% | 41.9% | 67.3% | 38.5% | 2018 | 42/42 | 9.1 | 3.9 | 56.5% | 75.1% | 49.9% | 66.5% | 39.2% | 64.0% | 33.8% |
| 25 | 2023 | 81/81 | 7.8 | 2.0 | 61.7% | 75.8% | 51.3% | 62.2% | 42.0% | 66.4% | 38.3% | 2019 | 42/42 | 7.2 | 3.7 | 58.4% | 72.0% | 53.1% | 64.5% | 35.4% | 64.3% | 33.0% |
| 26 | 2024 | 69/70 | 8.4 | 2.6 | 62.3% | 77.0% | 54.7% | 65.0% | 39.4% | 68.7% | 37.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 59/61 | 8.1 | 3.0 | 60.1% | 77.2% | 51.6% | 59.6% | 40.5% | 66.8% | 37.1% | 2021 | 19/19 | 7.3 | 5.2 | 52.3% | 70.7% | 45.5% | 60.3% | 39.0% | 58.5% | 34.8% |
| 28 | 2026 | 43/44 | 7.3 | 2.8 | 62.4% | 73.8% | 52.2% | 62.3% | 37.9% | 66.0% | 38.3% | 2022 | 9/9 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 55.6% | 71.3% | 47.9% | 61.2% | 43.2% | 60.5% | 35.3% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 52.0% | 66.3% | 48.5% | 70.8% | 32.5% | 57.9% | 37.7% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6/7 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 56.1% | 71.6% | 46.6% | 44.6% | 42.6% | 60.6% | 37.5% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2/2 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 52.0% | 82.0% | 36.0% | 80.5% | 0.0% | 59.5% | 28.5% |
| Career | — | 586/594 | 7.2 | 2.6 | 60.9% | 75.7% | 51.8% | 61.1% | 42.3% | 66.3% | 38.4% | — | 266/268 | 7.6 | 3.8 | 55.9% | 73.0% | 50.9% | 62.9% | 41.2% | 63.2% | 35.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Lucas Pouille | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2013 | 1483 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2014 | 1476 | 101.1 | -4.42 | +4.03 | 0.868 | 47.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1640 | 136.5 | -2.17 | -0.98 | 0.884 | 47.9% | -34 | -31 | — | 40.9% | -0.61 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1548 | 108.1 | -1.05 | -2.59 | 0.831 | 46.6% | -7 | — | — | 21.4% | -1.86 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1836 | 142.7 | -0.72 | +1.86 | 0.982 | 49.6% | -71 | -153 | -136 | 52.2% | +0.02 | 7–4 (64%) | 8–8 (50%) | — | -0.64 | 2013 | 1573 | 111.9 | -1.40 | -1.83 | 0.738 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.09 | — | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.03 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1752 | 155.3 | -1.25 | +2.58 | 1.049 | 50.6% | -6 | -75 | — | 44.3% | -0.09 | 5–3 (63%) | 5–12 (29%) | — | -0.34 | 2014 | 1654 | 131.1 | -2.20 | +2.30 | 0.912 | 48.7% | -26 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.81 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.06 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1975 | 157.5 | +0.70 | +3.55 | 1.120 | 51.8% | +2 | -200 | — | 57.4% | +0.53 | 12–4 (75%) | 12–13 (48%) | — | -2.08 | 2015 | 1701 | 133.8 | -1.49 | +0.18 | 0.911 | 48.9% | -53 | +45 | — | 46.8% | -0.58 | 1–3 (25%) | 9–2 (82%) | — | +0.15 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2135 | 168.1 | +5.94 | +4.57 | 1.386 | 54.8% | -36 | -208 | — | 72.1% | +1.38 | 7–4 (64%) | 11–10 (52%) | — | +0.29 | 2016 | 2016 | 159.8 | +0.67 | +0.29 | 0.972 | 49.7% | -66 | -154 | -294 | 53.4% | +0.07 | 15–6 (71%) | 18–9 (67%) | — | -0.57 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1959 | 166.5 | +4.06 | +3.24 | 1.195 | 52.7% | +29 | +6 | -139 | 63.7% | +0.88 | 10–10 (50%) | 14–15 (48%) | — | +0.66 | 2017 | 1955 | 156.0 | +1.95 | +1.28 | 1.111 | 51.9% | -27 | -47 | -170 | 59.0% | +0.48 | 11–6 (65%) | 15–16 (48%) | — | +3.76 |
| 24 | 2022 | 2034 | 165.8 | +3.42 | +2.72 | 1.178 | 52.4% | +41 | -14 | — | 64.3% | +0.85 | 17–6 (74%) | 15–10 (60%) | — | +2.62 | 2018 | 1805 | 144.4 | +0.50 | -1.71 | 0.939 | 49.4% | +52 | +23 | -12 | 48.6% | -0.01 | 9–5 (64%) | 11–14 (44%) | — | +2.47 |
| 25 | 2023 | 2053 | 171.1 | +3.18 | +2.82 | 1.140 | 52.2% | +18 | +54 | -47 | 64.1% | +0.90 | 14–11 (56%) | 19–17 (53%) | — | -0.85 | 2019 | 1873 | 156.8 | +0.45 | -0.73 | 0.926 | 49.1% | +19 | -71 | -2 | 50.9% | +0.03 | 6–6 (50%) | 14–13 (52%) | — | -0.44 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1883 | 158.4 | +4.26 | +1.82 | 1.183 | 52.4% | +39 | +119 | — | 58.9% | +0.70 | 14–8 (64%) | 14–20 (41%) | — | +4.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 1847 | 150.1 | +2.41 | +1.68 | 1.115 | 51.6% | -2 | +81 | +80 | 55.6% | +0.41 | 9–10 (47%) | 18–12 (60%) | — | +3.51 | 2021 | 1670 | 120.5 | -2.72 | -1.59 | 0.838 | 47.2% | +121 | +7 | — | 35.3% | -1.06 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.30 |
| 28 | 2026 | 1859 | 152.3 | +1.73 | +2.11 | 1.127 | 51.8% | -10 | +123 | — | 59.5% | +0.67 | 8–7 (53%) | 12–13 (48%) | — | +0.72 | 2022 | 1615 | 126.8 | -1.67 | +0.07 | 0.893 | 48.2% | +118 | +29 | — | 38.5% | -0.62 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1671 | 112.4 | -0.67 | +0.06 | 0.894 | 48.1% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.34 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1733 | 119.4 | -1.01 | +0.25 | 0.951 | 49.5% | +3 | — | +165 | 42.9% | -0.07 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.18 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1704 | 113.4 | -0.01 | +0.30 | 0.704 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.43 |
| Career | — | 2176 | 163.8 | +2.56 | +2.55 | 1.139 | 52.0% | +6 | +8 | -64 | 59.3% | +0.63 | 107–73 (59%) | 131–137 (49%) | 99.0 | +1.32 | — | 2035 | 150.6 | +0.18 | -0.14 | 0.956 | 49.5% | -2 | -43 | -94 | 49.4% | -0.09 | 47–36 (57%) | 75–62 (55%) | 106.2 | +1.88 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 6 | 5 | 11 | Feb 19, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexander Zverev | 3 | 7 | 10 | Nov 11, 2024 | H2H |
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 7 | 2 | 9 | Sep 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 2 | 7 | 9 | Nov 13, 2023 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 3, 2022 | H2H |
| Feliciano Lopez | 5 | 1 | 6 | Aug 24, 2021 | H2H |
| Richard Gasquet | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jul 3, 2019 | H2H |
| Gilles Simon | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 3, 2022 | H2H |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 1, 2021 | H2H |