H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Nick Kyrgios H2H: 1-2
Nick Kyrgios holds a 2–1 lead over Andrey Rublev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nick Kyrgios leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nick Kyrgios won the 2022 Miami Masters second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2022* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nick Kyrgios | 6-3 6-0 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) 6-3 | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2018* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nick Kyrgios | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 |