H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Sam Querrey H2H: 3-1
Andrey Rublev holds a 3–1 lead over Sam Querrey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrey Rublev leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2020 Roland Garros first round 6-7(5) 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Andrey Rublev | 6-7(5) 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 6-3 | Sam Querrey | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2020* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-3 6-3 | Sam Querrey | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2019* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 7-6(4) 7-6(10) | Sam Querrey | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Sam Querrey | 6-3 6-2 6-3 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Sam Querrey | #529 | #11 | 2,595 | 2,037 | 372 | 315 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Sam Querrey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #130 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #63 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #25 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #18 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #93 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2012 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #22 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,877 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2015 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,943 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,822 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #44 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,817 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #108 | 1,702 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #329 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 |