H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Stefano Travaglia H2H: 1-0
Andrey Rublev holds a 1–0 lead over Stefano Travaglia in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Andrey Rublev | 6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 1-6 7-5 | Stefano Travaglia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 374 | 212 | 63.8% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 18 |
| Stefano Travaglia | #150 | #60 | 1,039 | 1,806 | 29 | 56 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Stefano Travaglia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #134 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2019 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #16 | 1,896 | 0 | 18 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #74 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #78 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #310 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |