H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Thiago Monteiro H2H: 1-0
Andrey Rublev holds a 1–0 lead over Thiago Monteiro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2021 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-4 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 6-4 7-6(8) | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2019 | Munich | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Thiago Monteiro | 6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 374 | 212 | 63.8% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 18 |
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #16 | 1,896 | 0 | 18 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |