H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Andrey Rublev holds a 2–0 lead over Thiago Seyboth Wild in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrey Rublev leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2024 US Open first round 6-3 7-6(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | 6-3 7-6(3) 7-5 | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Match data | Aug 28, 2024* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Andrey Rublev | 7-5 6-4 3-6 4-6 7-6(6) | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Match data | Jan 16, 2024* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #24 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,175 | 377 | 216 | 63.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 18 |
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | #198 | #58 | 855 | 1,767 | 38 | 51 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Thiago Seyboth Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #131 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #417 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #5 | 1,959 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #79 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,033 | 0 | 12 | 2024 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #74 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,052 | 0 | 14 | 2025 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 16 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #24 | 1,859 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Thiago Seyboth Wild | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 28 | 15 | 43 | 65.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 31 | 8 | 39 | 79.5% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 30 | 15 | 45 | 66.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2023 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 37 | 13 | 50 | 74.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2024 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2023 | 29 | 18 | 47 | 61.7% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2025 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 32 | 19 | 51 | 62.7% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 22 | 17 | 39 | 56.4% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 251 | 151 | 402 | 62.4% | 103 | 51 | 154 | 66.9% | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | — | 9 | 17 | 26 | 34.6% | 27 | 32 | 59 | 45.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 586/594 of Andrey Rublev's and 88/89 of Thiago Seyboth Wild's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Thiago Seyboth Wild | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 63.4% | 77.8% | 57.7% | 75.0% | 0.0% | 70.4% | 25.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 17/17 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 63.3% | 68.0% | 49.8% | 51.1% | 38.7% | 60.9% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 7/7 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 60.3% | 66.3% | 50.7% | 50.3% | 35.3% | 60.0% | 33.2% | 2018 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 58.8% | 72.5% | 60.7% | 25.0% | 20.0% | 67.6% | 36.5% |
| 19 | 2017 | 33/33 | 5.1 | 3.8 | 57.1% | 70.3% | 49.3% | 53.5% | 42.7% | 61.0% | 38.3% | 2019 | 4/4 | 5.3 | 3.5 | 56.6% | 69.0% | 55.1% | 53.2% | 27.7% | 63.1% | 34.2% |
| 20 | 2018 | 36/37 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 59.2% | 74.8% | 45.4% | 61.7% | 41.3% | 62.3% | 39.5% | 2020 | 8/8 | 6.3 | 2.9 | 61.0% | 72.5% | 52.4% | 72.7% | 36.2% | 64.8% | 39.6% |
| 21 | 2019 | 53/53 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 58.8% | 73.8% | 51.4% | 59.6% | 44.4% | 64.7% | 39.6% | 2021 | 7/7 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 57.6% | 65.3% | 48.3% | 47.4% | 46.0% | 58.2% | 34.4% |
| 22 | 2020 | 51/51 | 8.1 | 1.5 | 60.0% | 80.3% | 55.2% | 60.5% | 49.5% | 70.2% | 41.3% | 2022 | 2/2 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 59.3% | 61.8% | 46.6% | 45.2% | 20.0% | 55.6% | 32.6% |
| 23 | 2021 | 65/68 | 7.4 | 1.9 | 60.8% | 77.0% | 51.8% | 61.9% | 45.8% | 67.2% | 39.1% | 2023 | 9/9 | 6.2 | 4.3 | 61.4% | 69.4% | 55.6% | 52.6% | 35.7% | 64.2% | 35.2% |
| 24 | 2022 | 71/71 | 7.9 | 2.1 | 62.4% | 77.0% | 52.0% | 64.3% | 41.9% | 67.3% | 38.5% | 2024 | 42/43 | 5.5 | 3.1 | 62.0% | 69.7% | 50.0% | 59.9% | 46.2% | 62.3% | 34.2% |
| 25 | 2023 | 81/81 | 7.8 | 2.0 | 61.7% | 75.8% | 51.3% | 62.2% | 42.0% | 66.4% | 38.3% | 2025 | 14/14 | 5.9 | 2.6 | 64.1% | 71.1% | 47.4% | 54.6% | 30.6% | 62.9% | 34.3% |
| 26 | 2024 | 69/70 | 8.4 | 2.6 | 62.3% | 77.0% | 54.7% | 65.0% | 39.4% | 68.7% | 37.1% | 2026 | 1/1 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 65.0% | 59.0% | 54.0% | 70.0% | 57.0% | 57.0% | 40.0% |
| 27 | 2025 | 59/61 | 8.1 | 3.0 | 60.1% | 77.2% | 51.6% | 59.6% | 40.5% | 66.8% | 37.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 43/44 | 7.3 | 2.8 | 62.4% | 73.8% | 52.2% | 62.3% | 37.9% | 66.0% | 38.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 586/594 | 7.2 | 2.6 | 60.9% | 75.7% | 51.8% | 61.1% | 42.3% | 66.3% | 38.4% | — | 88/89 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 61.5% | 69.5% | 50.6% | 57.6% | 40.1% | 62.4% | 34.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Thiago Seyboth Wild | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2013 | 1483 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2014 | 1476 | 101.1 | -4.42 | +4.03 | 0.868 | 47.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1640 | 136.5 | -2.17 | -0.98 | 0.884 | 47.9% | -34 | -31 | — | 40.9% | -0.61 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1548 | 108.1 | -1.05 | -2.59 | 0.831 | 46.6% | -7 | — | — | 21.4% | -1.86 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.15 | 2018 | 1465 | 96.8 | -2.47 | -1.99 | 1.127 | 49.4% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | 0.00 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1836 | 142.7 | -0.72 | +1.86 | 0.982 | 49.6% | -71 | -153 | -136 | 52.2% | +0.02 | 7–4 (64%) | 8–8 (50%) | — | -0.64 | 2019 | 1461 | 108.8 | -0.23 | -3.01 | 0.927 | 48.3% | — | +50 | — | 36.4% | -0.45 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.43 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1752 | 155.3 | -1.25 | +2.58 | 1.049 | 50.6% | -6 | -75 | — | 44.3% | -0.09 | 5–3 (63%) | 5–12 (29%) | — | -0.34 | 2020 | 1538 | 120.2 | +1.67 | +0.86 | 1.124 | 52.3% | — | +70 | — | 57.9% | +0.68 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.02 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1975 | 157.5 | +0.70 | +3.55 | 1.120 | 51.8% | +2 | -200 | — | 57.4% | +0.53 | 12–4 (75%) | 12–13 (48%) | — | -2.08 | 2021 | 1546 | 114.8 | -1.20 | -1.98 | 0.825 | 46.7% | — | +39 | — | 18.8% | -1.44 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.36 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2135 | 168.1 | +5.94 | +4.57 | 1.386 | 54.8% | -36 | -208 | — | 72.1% | +1.38 | 7–4 (64%) | 11–10 (52%) | — | +0.29 | 2022 | 1495 | 101.6 | -1.01 | -1.23 | 0.734 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.40 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.18 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1959 | 166.5 | +4.06 | +3.24 | 1.195 | 52.7% | +29 | +6 | -139 | 63.7% | +0.88 | 10–10 (50%) | 14–15 (48%) | — | +0.66 | 2023 | 1585 | 121.5 | +0.46 | -0.41 | 0.981 | 49.1% | -105 | +86 | — | 40.7% | -0.26 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–7 (13%) | — | -0.04 |
| 24 | 2022 | 2034 | 165.8 | +3.42 | +2.72 | 1.178 | 52.4% | +41 | -14 | — | 64.3% | +0.85 | 17–6 (74%) | 15–10 (60%) | — | +2.62 | 2024 | 1755 | 142.0 | -1.25 | -1.15 | 0.908 | 49.0% | -28 | -62 | -124 | 47.2% | -0.23 | 7–6 (54%) | 7–8 (47%) | — | -0.48 |
| 25 | 2023 | 2053 | 171.1 | +3.18 | +2.82 | 1.140 | 52.2% | +18 | +54 | -47 | 64.1% | +0.90 | 14–11 (56%) | 19–17 (53%) | — | -0.85 | 2025 | 1639 | 121.3 | -0.98 | -1.58 | 0.923 | 49.1% | +32 | +40 | — | 44.4% | -0.39 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.10 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1883 | 158.4 | +4.26 | +1.82 | 1.183 | 52.4% | +39 | +119 | — | 58.9% | +0.70 | 14–8 (64%) | 14–20 (41%) | — | +4.67 | 2026 | 1583 | 101.3 | -2.84 | -1.56 | 0.930 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.12 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1847 | 150.1 | +2.41 | +1.68 | 1.115 | 51.6% | -2 | +81 | +80 | 55.6% | +0.41 | 9–10 (47%) | 18–12 (60%) | — | +3.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 1859 | 152.3 | +1.73 | +2.11 | 1.127 | 51.8% | -10 | +123 | — | 59.5% | +0.67 | 8–7 (53%) | 12–13 (48%) | — | +0.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2176 | 163.8 | +2.56 | +2.55 | 1.139 | 52.0% | +6 | +8 | -64 | 59.3% | +0.63 | 107–73 (59%) | 131–137 (49%) | 99.0 | +1.32 | — | 1768 | 129.4 | -0.74 | -1.13 | 0.927 | 49.0% | -28 | +9 | -124 | 43.9% | -0.32 | 17–16 (52%) | 13–22 (37%) | 100.8 | +0.51 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 6 | 5 | 11 | Feb 19, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexander Zverev | 3 | 7 | 10 | Nov 11, 2024 | H2H |
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 7 | 2 | 9 | Sep 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 2 | 7 | 9 | Nov 13, 2023 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 15, 2025 | H2H |
| Nuno Borges | 3 | 0 | 3 | May 9, 2025 | H2H |
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Hugo Dellien | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 8, 2025 | H2H |