H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Thiago Seyboth Wild H2H: 2-0
Andrey Rublev holds a 2–0 lead over Thiago Seyboth Wild in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrey Rublev leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2024 US Open first round 6-3 7-6(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 26
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-3 7-6(3) 7-5 | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2024* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 7-5 6-4 3-6 4-6 7-6(6) | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | #284 | #58 | 855 | 1,775 | 38 | 50 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Thiago Seyboth Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #417 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2024 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2025 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |