H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Yannick Hanfmann H2H: 2-1
Andrey Rublev holds a 2–1 lead over Yannick Hanfmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yannick Hanfmann leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2023 Halle fourth round 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Germany
Age 34
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2023* | Halle | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Andrey Rublev | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Yannick Hanfmann | Match data |
| May 17, 2023* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Yannick Hanfmann | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-3 6-3 6-4 | Yannick Hanfmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Yannick Hanfmann | #51 | #45 | 974 | 1,865 | 97 | 107 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Yannick Hanfmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #119 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | 2020 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #99 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #126 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |