H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 1-1
Andrey Rublev and Yen-Hsun Lu are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2017 Chengdu fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2017* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-2 6-1 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 4-6 6-3 7-6(0) 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 373 | 212 | 63.8% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrey Rublev | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #16 | 1,883 | 0 | 17 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |