H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andy Murray vs David Nalbandian H2H: 5-2

Andy Murray holds a 5–2 lead over David Nalbandian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Andy Murray leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andy Murray won the 2012 Rome Masters third round 6-1 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andy Murray
GBR Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2012* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Andy Murray #4 6-1 4-6 7-5 David Nalbandian #42 Match data
Oct 8, 2011* Tokyo ATP 500 QF Hard Andy Murray #4 6-4 7-5 David Nalbandian #64 Match data
Aug 17, 2011* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Andy Murray #4 6-4 6-1 David Nalbandian #66 Match data
Nov 10, 2010* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Andy Murray #4 2-6 6-4 6-3 David Nalbandian #25 Match data
Aug 14, 2010* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Andy Murray #4 6-2 6-2 David Nalbandian #45 Match data
Nov 1, 2008* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard David Nalbandian #8 7-6(3) 6-3 Andy Murray #4 Match data
Jun 26, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass David Nalbandian #19 6-7(4) 1-6 6-0 6-4 6-1 Andy Murray #312 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andy Murray #160 #1 12,685 2,470 703 264 72.7% 3 14 1 10 16 44
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andy Murray David Nalbandian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 14–9 60.9% #64 1,751 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0
19 2006 37–25 59.7% #17 1,859 0 1 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0
20 2007 40–14 74.1% #11 1,959 0 3 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2
21 2008 56–16 77.8% #4 2,194 0 8 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2
22 2009 64–12 84.2% #4 2,211 0 14 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2
23 2010 46–18 71.9% #4 2,134 0 16 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4
24 2011 54–13 80.6% #4 2,254 0 21 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5
25 2012 53–17 75.7% #3 2,254 1 23 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7
26 2013 41–8 83.7% #4 2,263 2 27 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9
27 2014 57–19 75.0% #6 2,227 2 30 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10
28 2015 63–15 80.8% #2 2,288 2 34 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11
29 2016 71–8 89.9% #1 2,464 3 42 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11
30 2017 26–10 72.2% #16 2,223 3 43 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11
31 2018 7–6 53.8% #240 2,083 3 43 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11
32 2019 10–7 58.8% #125 2,014 3 44 — — — — — — —
33 2020 3–4 42.9% #122 1,953 3 44 — — — — — — —
34 2021 15–14 51.7% #134 1,897 3 44 — — — — — — —
35 2022 25–19 56.8% #49 1,865 3 44 — — — — — — —
36 2023 15–18 45.5% #42 1,780 3 44 — — — — — — —
37 2024 6–12 33.3% #160 1,707 3 44 — — — — — — —