H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andy Murray vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 4-3

Andy Murray holds a 4–3 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Andy Murray won the 2012 Wimbledon third round 7-5 3-6 7-5 6-1.

GBR Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 1, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Andy Murray #4 7-5 3-6 7-5 6-1 Marcos Baghdatis #42 Match data
Jan 7, 2012* Brisbane ATP 250 QF Hard Andy Murray #4 6-2 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #44 Match data
Oct 6, 2011* Tokyo ATP 500 R32 Hard Andy Murray #4 7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #54 Match data
Feb 10, 2011* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #20 6-4 6-1 Andy Murray #5 Match data
May 30, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Andy Murray #4 6-2 6-3 0-6 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #30 Match data
Aug 15, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #18 6-1 6-2 Andy Murray #16 Match data
Jul 5, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #16 6-3 6-4 7-6(2) Andy Murray #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andy Murray #160 #1 12,685 2,470 703 264 72.7% 3 14 1 10 16 44
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andy Murray Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 14–9 60.9% #64 1,751 0 0
19 2006 37–25 59.7% #17 1,859 0 1 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2007 40–14 74.1% #11 1,959 0 3 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2008 56–16 77.8% #4 2,194 0 8 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2009 64–12 84.2% #4 2,211 0 14 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2010 46–18 71.9% #4 2,134 0 16 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2011 54–13 80.6% #4 2,254 0 21 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2012 53–17 75.7% #3 2,254 1 23 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2013 41–8 83.7% #4 2,263 2 27 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2014 57–19 75.0% #6 2,227 2 30 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2015 63–15 80.8% #2 2,288 2 34 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2016 71–8 89.9% #1 2,464 3 42 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2017 26–10 72.2% #16 2,223 3 43 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2018 7–6 53.8% #240 2,083 3 43 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2019 10–7 58.8% #125 2,014 3 44 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2020 3–4 42.9% #122 1,953 3 44 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2021 15–14 51.7% #134 1,897 3 44 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2022 25–19 56.8% #49 1,865 3 44
36 2023 15–18 45.5% #42 1,780 3 44
37 2024 6–12 33.3% #160 1,707 3 44