H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Andy Murray vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 5-3

Andy Murray holds a 5–3 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Andy Murray leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Andy Murray won the 2012 London Olympics third round 4-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andy Murray
GBR Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andy Murray #4 4-6 6-1 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #45 Match data Aug 2, 2012* R16 London Olympics Olympics Grass
Andy Murray #4 7-5 3-6 7-5 6-1 Marcos Baghdatis #42 Match data Jul 1, 2012* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Andy Murray #4 6-2 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #44 Match data Jan 7, 2012* QF Brisbane International ATP 250 Hard
Andy Murray #4 7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #54 Match data Oct 6, 2011* R32 Japan Open ATP 500 Hard
Marcos Baghdatis #20 6-4 6-1 Andy Murray #5 Match data Feb 10, 2011* R32 ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Andy Murray #4 6-2 6-3 0-6 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #30 Match data May 30, 2010* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Marcos Baghdatis #18 6-1 6-2 Andy Murray #16 Match data Aug 15, 2007* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Marcos Baghdatis #16 6-3 6-4 7-6(2) Andy Murray #44 Match data Jul 5, 2006* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andy Murray #160 #1 12,685 2,478 715 265 73.0% 3 2 14 1 9 17 46
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 327 274 54.4% 0 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andy Murray Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 14–9 60.9% #64 1,750 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 37–25 59.7% #17 1,859 0 1 2004 2–2 50.0% #159 1,576 0 0
20 2007 40–14 74.1% #11 1,961 0 3 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,699 0 0
21 2008 56–17 76.7% #4 2,184 0 8 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2009 64–12 84.2% #4 2,218 0 14 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,938 0 2
23 2010 46–18 71.9% #4 2,137 0 16 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,814 0 2
24 2011 54–13 80.6% #4 2,251 0 21 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,784 0 3
25 2012 59–17 77.6% #3 2,295 1 24 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,851 0 4
26 2013 41–8 83.7% #4 2,277 2 28 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2014 57–19 75.0% #6 2,225 2 31 2012 33–25 56.9% #36 1,908 0 4
28 2015 63–15 80.8% #2 2,298 2 35 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,806 0 4
29 2016 77–8 90.6% #1 2,473 3 44 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,704 0 4
30 2017 26–10 72.2% #16 2,229 3 45 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,870 0 4
31 2018 7–6 53.8% #240 2,113 3 45 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2019 10–7 58.8% #125 2,031 3 46 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2020 3–4 42.9% #122 1,965 3 46 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,728 0 4
34 2021 15–14 51.7% #134 1,899 3 46 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,743 0 4
35 2022 25–19 56.8% #49 1,867 3 46 — — — — — — —
36 2023 15–18 45.5% #42 1,786 3 46 — — — — — — —
37 2024 6–12 33.3% #160 1,709 3 46 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andy Murray Marcos Baghdatis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 26 14 40 65.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 35 12 47 74.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
21 2008 43 10 53 81.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2006 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2009 45 7 52 86.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2007 23 15 38 60.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2010 34 12 46 73.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 2011 32 8 40 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2009 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 38 11 49 77.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — 2010 33 18 51 64.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 26 5 31 83.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 0 12 100.0% — — — — 2011 18 18 36 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
27 2014 44 14 58 75.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2012 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
28 2015 38 12 50 76.0% 15 2 17 88.2% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2013 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2016 47 5 52 90.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 12 0 12 100.0% — — — — 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2017 12 3 15 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 17 13 30 56.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 2018 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
32 2019 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
33 2020 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 2021 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2019 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 2022 16 15 31 51.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 14 13 27 51.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 493 179 672 73.4% 101 52 153 66.0% 113 31 144 78.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — 233 182 415 56.1% 30 50 80 37.5% 55 40 95 57.9% 9 2 11 81.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 951/980 of Andy Murray's and 594/601 of Marcos Baghdatis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andy Murray Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 23/23 7.8 3.9 52.0% 78.0% 50.5% 60.8% 47.6% 64.7% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 62/62 4.8 3.3 53.6% 69.2% 49.7% 55.4% 44.4% 60.1% 43.1% 2004 2/4 11.5 7.5 51.4% 71.0% 41.1% 18.3% 61.4% 56.3% 38.1%
20 2007 54/54 6.1 2.6 55.1% 74.2% 52.7% 59.6% 41.8% 64.4% 42.4% 2005 23/23 7.5 2.6 56.7% 73.2% 52.6% 55.8% 51.8% 64.3% 37.5%
21 2008 71/73 6.6 2.2 57.5% 74.9% 52.5% 59.7% 44.7% 65.3% 41.9% 2006 53/53 7.4 3.3 52.5% 74.5% 50.5% 54.0% 44.4% 62.8% 40.2%
22 2009 75/76 7.7 2.2 58.2% 77.3% 54.0% 64.7% 49.5% 67.6% 43.7% 2007 66/66 6.8 2.7 52.6% 75.1% 54.2% 61.3% 46.5% 65.0% 39.2%
23 2010 64/64 8.4 2.4 53.9% 78.1% 53.4% 62.1% 44.3% 66.7% 41.7% 2008 24/24 8.2 3.8 54.0% 77.5% 53.3% 57.0% 35.8% 66.3% 35.2%
24 2011 65/67 7.6 2.3 58.7% 75.6% 51.9% 61.0% 48.2% 65.8% 45.0% 2009 33/34 7.2 3.0 52.8% 75.2% 51.2% 56.2% 43.9% 63.7% 39.4%
25 2012 66/76 7.1 2.4 59.7% 74.8% 55.3% 66.4% 44.0% 67.1% 42.4% 2010 68/68 7.3 2.9 51.3% 75.9% 52.1% 57.6% 43.5% 64.5% 38.6%
26 2013 49/49 7.2 2.2 62.5% 74.8% 52.2% 65.2% 45.8% 66.2% 42.6% 2011 53/53 7.5 2.9 51.3% 76.4% 51.0% 59.2% 46.0% 63.9% 36.7%
27 2014 75/76 6.0 2.7 59.9% 75.0% 51.6% 57.9% 47.0% 65.7% 42.1% 2012 55/58 6.3 3.1 54.7% 73.6% 52.4% 54.6% 43.1% 64.2% 37.9%
28 2015 77/78 6.7 2.2 61.6% 75.5% 53.5% 62.9% 48.7% 67.0% 42.0% 2013 36/36 7.6 4.3 53.0% 75.3% 51.9% 64.0% 39.1% 64.1% 34.4%
29 2016 77/85 6.8 2.6 59.3% 77.5% 54.5% 64.5% 47.5% 68.2% 43.4% 2014 18/18 6.4 4.6 52.0% 74.5% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 63.0% 35.2%
30 2017 35/36 5.7 2.8 59.3% 73.4% 54.0% 52.1% 49.2% 65.4% 42.9% 2015 45/45 7.8 3.6 54.5% 74.1% 51.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.6% 37.6%
31 2018 12/13 7.3 4.3 58.5% 71.9% 46.5% 64.5% 40.2% 61.3% 39.4% 2016 49/49 6.0 3.3 52.3% 73.9% 53.6% 58.4% 43.5% 64.0% 36.9%
32 2019 17/17 8.6 2.8 58.2% 74.9% 50.4% 59.5% 43.7% 64.5% 37.4% 2017 34/34 7.6 3.5 52.0% 76.6% 49.9% 62.7% 39.9% 64.1% 36.3%
33 2020 7/7 4.7 4.0 51.1% 66.5% 49.9% 52.9% 29.1% 58.3% 31.0% 2018 28/29 9.6 3.5 56.0% 74.9% 50.9% 56.9% 37.7% 64.0% 38.1%
34 2021 29/29 7.9 2.7 57.4% 73.6% 51.2% 60.6% 42.0% 64.1% 37.3% 2019 7/7 5.7 4.1 55.2% 77.5% 46.0% 56.1% 43.2% 63.4% 37.0%
35 2022 43/44 6.7 2.7 59.8% 74.2% 49.5% 57.0% 40.2% 64.1% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 32/33 4.8 2.3 60.5% 71.4% 51.3% 61.2% 41.0% 63.1% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 18/18 6.1 2.0 59.0% 70.8% 53.1% 53.7% 30.8% 63.5% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andy Murray Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2005 1751 143.1 +1.47 +1.47 1.085 51.3% -6 — -81 60.6% +0.45 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) — -0.71 2003 1485 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1860 148.5 -1.43 +5.80 1.082 51.3% +6 -372 -84 57.1% +0.39 12–10 (55%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.07 2004 1576 118.7 -0.69 +1.61 0.871 47.4% +16 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — -0.09
20 2007 1962 155.7 +1.41 +5.51 1.191 53.1% +30 — — 68.5% +1.18 12–4 (75%) 13–4 (76%) — +1.37 2005 1700 138.3 +1.75 +0.83 1.048 50.7% +36 — — 49.3% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.74
21 2008 2184 170.9 +3.07 +6.39 1.209 53.3% +33 -537 -227 67.4% +1.07 16–2 (89%) 23–10 (70%) — -3.13 2006 1843 151.4 +0.96 +3.30 1.081 51.5% +9 -291 -70 59.3% +0.45 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -1.44
22 2009 2219 173.2 +4.90 +7.40 1.349 55.2% +61 -342 -90 76.2% +1.75 13–4 (76%) 11–10 (52%) — +1.49 2007 1938 150.2 +2.29 +2.86 1.121 52.1% -36 -250 -59 61.7% +0.72 13–6 (68%) 18–16 (53%) — -0.34
23 2010 2137 171.2 +3.96 +6.12 1.254 54.0% +52 -197 +26 67.7% +1.29 8–7 (53%) 9–14 (39%) — -0.50 2008 1814 141.8 +1.75 -0.01 1.045 50.5% +1 — +137 56.3% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.74
24 2011 2251 174.7 +3.89 +7.94 1.314 54.9% 0 -167 +48 72.3% +1.51 11–3 (79%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.07 2009 1785 147.9 +0.73 +2.59 1.086 51.4% +42 — +151 56.4% +0.42 1–6 (14%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.90
25 2012 2296 178.2 +4.40 +7.17 1.290 54.5% +15 -191 +164 71.6% +1.43 11–8 (58%) 18–9 (67%) — -4.01 2010 1852 156.2 +1.70 +2.21 1.087 51.3% +40 -122 -46 59.2% +0.51 12–11 (52%) 16–8 (67%) — -0.06
26 2013 2277 169.6 +3.35 +6.07 1.260 54.2% +21 -211 +291 76.7% +1.57 9–1 (90%) 15–7 (68%) — +0.03 2011 1844 157.1 +1.07 +0.51 1.016 50.4% +32 -159 +46 52.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) — -0.79
27 2014 2225 175.1 +2.71 +6.24 1.228 53.4% +30 -59 +249 68.2% +1.18 16–6 (73%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.84 2012 1908 155.9 +1.50 +1.16 1.059 50.9% +21 -225 +14 56.4% +0.32 9–6 (60%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.33
28 2015 2298 180.8 +3.66 +7.38 1.272 54.2% +5 +48 +191 73.7% +1.47 13–3 (81%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.45 2013 1806 154.0 +1.07 -0.98 0.959 49.3% +63 -182 +5 43.6% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.69
29 2016 2473 182.2 +4.89 +7.90 1.364 55.4% -19 -49 +111 79.4% +1.96 18–5 (78%) 21–9 (70%) — -1.64 2014 1705 123.0 -0.60 -0.13 0.951 48.8% +34 — +84 46.8% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.23
30 2017 2230 160.7 +1.22 +5.41 1.240 53.9% +125 +61 +164 70.7% +1.24 2–5 (29%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.03 2015 1870 152.8 -0.76 +2.30 1.033 50.6% -3 -251 -6 56.9% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.74
31 2018 2113 134.4 -1.52 +2.62 1.017 50.7% +146 — +221 51.6% +0.35 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.47 2016 1884 158.0 +0.22 +1.50 1.027 50.2% +24 -227 -33 52.5% +0.08 6–7 (46%) 12–10 (55%) — -2.18
32 2019 2031 144.9 +0.49 +1.61 1.055 50.6% +72 — — 53.3% +0.27 6–3 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.58 2017 1839 144.1 +0.48 -0.05 1.011 50.1% +31 -215 -34 52.1% +0.15 6–1 (86%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.55
33 2020 1965 133.7 -1.63 -0.29 0.743 45.4% +71 — — 33.3% -1.33 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.71 2018 1728 136.9 +0.05 +0.78 1.058 50.5% +55 -175 +46 43.8% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.39
34 2021 1899 152.6 +0.83 +1.37 1.038 50.7% +25 — +382 48.6% +0.24 6–3 (67%) 5–10 (33%) — -2.53 2019 1743 122.7 -0.99 +0.40 1.010 49.8% +39 — — 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.56
35 2022 1867 150.6 +0.33 +2.40 1.070 51.2% -35 — +358 53.6% +0.29 10–6 (63%) 10–8 (56%) — -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1786 144.3 +0.31 +0.95 0.984 49.6% +22 +420 +360 47.8% -0.12 8–7 (53%) 12–10 (55%) — -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1709 134.1 -0.03 -1.52 0.887 47.7% +62 — +378 37.2% -0.60 3–4 (43%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2478 174.8 +2.63 +5.69 1.207 53.3% +25 -143 +115 67.1% +1.12 185–90 (67%) 220–152 (59%) 107.9 -1.43 — 1953 157.5 +0.97 +1.47 1.049 50.7% +23 -204 +4 54.6% +0.27 95–94 (50%) 147–125 (54%) 100.7 -1.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.