H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andy Murray vs Tim Henman H2H: 3-1
Andy Murray holds a 3–1 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andy Murray leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Bangkok third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2006* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-2 | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2006* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andy Murray | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2006* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andy Murray | 6-2 7-6(3) | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Oct 27, 2005* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andy Murray | 6-2 5-7 7-6(4) | Tim Henman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Murray | #160 | #1 | 12,685 | 2,470 | 703 | 264 | 72.7% | 3 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 16 | 44 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Murray | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #64 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #17 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–14 | 74.1% | #11 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,194 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #4 | 2,211 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,134 | 0 | 16 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2011 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 21 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2012 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,254 | 1 | 23 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2013 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #4 | 2,263 | 2 | 27 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2014 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,227 | 2 | 30 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2015 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,288 | 2 | 34 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2016 | 71–8 | 89.9% | #1 | 2,464 | 3 | 42 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2017 | 26–10 | 72.2% | #16 | 2,223 | 3 | 43 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2018 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #240 | 2,083 | 3 | 43 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2019 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #125 | 2,014 | 3 | 44 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,953 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #134 | 1,897 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #49 | 1,865 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #42 | 1,780 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,707 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |