H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Andy Roddick vs Albert Costa H2H: 1-1
Andy Roddick and Albert Costa are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on clay, while Albert Costa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2005 Rome Masters third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2005* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Andy Roddick | 6-4 7-5 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Albert Costa | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Albert Costa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 |
| 28 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 |