H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Andy Roddick vs Alex Calatrava H2H: 2-0
Andy Roddick holds a 2–0 lead over Alex Calatrava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2002 Rome Masters second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2002* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Andy Roddick | 6-2 6-3 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2002* | Houston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andy Roddick | 6-2 6-1 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Alex Calatrava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 | 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 | 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 | 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 |