Andy Roddick
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 3 | 21 | 24 | Mar 26, 2012 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 7 | 7 | 14 | Jan 19, 2012 | H2H |
| Tommy Haas | 6 | 7 | 13 | Nov 3, 2011 | H2H |
| James Blake | 9 | 3 | 12 | Aug 22, 2012 | H2H |
| Andy Murray | 4 | 8 | 12 | Nov 11, 2011 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Andy Roddick holds a 9–3 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 7–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2011 Queen's Club Championships quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Roddick | 6-2 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Jun 11, 2011* | QF | Queen's Club Championships | ATP 250 | Grass |
| Fernando Verdasco | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Andy Roddick | Match data | Feb 14, 2010* | F | San Jose | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Andy Roddick | 7-6(2) 4-6 7-6(5) | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Aug 14, 2009* | R16 | Canadian Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Andy Roddick | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Aug 16, 2007* | R32 | Cincinnati Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-4 7-6(2) | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Jul 1, 2007* | R32 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Andy Roddick | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Sep 3, 2006* | R32 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-4 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Mar 23, 2006* | R32 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-4 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Mar 9, 2006* | R32 | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Fernando Verdasco | 6-7(1) 7-6(3) 6-4 | Andy Roddick | Match data | May 7, 2005* | R16 | Italian Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Fernando Verdasco | 7-6(9) 4-3 (ret.) | Andy Roddick | Match data | Mar 23, 2005* | R64 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Andy Roddick | 6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Mar 9, 2005* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Aug 13, 2003* | R64 | Cincinnati Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,175 | 580 | 198 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 32 |
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,127 | 549 | 442 | 55.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,922 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,091 | 1 | 11 | 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 68–16 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,068 | 1 | 15 | 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,036 | 1 | 20 | 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 2,008 | 1 | 21 | 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 | 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,875 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,007 | 1 | 26 | 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,003 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,045 | 1 | 27 | 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,927 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,990 | 1 | 29 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,025 | 1 | 30 | 2012 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2012 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #39 | 1,990 | 1 | 32 | 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,896 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,879 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,823 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,914 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2000 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 12 | 1 | 13 | 92.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2002 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 32 | 11 | 43 | 74.4% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2003 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 44 | 10 | 54 | 81.5% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2004 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2004 | 51 | 11 | 62 | 82.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 11 | 1 | 12 | 91.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2005 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 22 | 2005 | 29 | 9 | 38 | 76.3% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 11 | 1 | 12 | 91.7% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 2006 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2006 | 36 | 12 | 48 | 75.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2007 | 36 | 11 | 47 | 76.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2008 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 38 | 12 | 50 | 76.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2009 | 35 | 15 | 50 | 70.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 33 | 11 | 44 | 75.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 22 | 7 | 29 | 75.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 42 | 15 | 57 | 73.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 27 | 11 | 38 | 71.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 18 | 15 | 33 | 54.5% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 407 | 137 | 544 | 74.8% | 67 | 29 | 96 | 69.8% | 83 | 22 | 105 | 79.0% | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | — | 259 | 235 | 494 | 52.4% | 231 | 156 | 387 | 59.7% | 51 | 44 | 95 | 53.7% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 752/778 of Andy Roddick's and 988/991 of Fernando Verdasco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2000 | 7/9 | 7.4 | 2.1 | 56.8% | 76.4% | 57.4% | 61.0% | 37.5% | 68.5% | 33.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 50/55 | 10.4 | 3.6 | 58.9% | 80.0% | 57.0% | 66.5% | 37.5% | 70.3% | 37.0% | 2002 | 3/3 | 1.7 | 6.3 | 71.8% | 56.3% | 32.1% | 54.4% | 39.3% | 49.7% | 37.0% |
| 19 | 2002 | 62/70 | 9.0 | 2.6 | 61.4% | 79.8% | 54.3% | 64.2% | 43.5% | 70.0% | 37.3% | 2003 | 18/19 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 64.8% | 68.3% | 55.7% | 51.0% | 42.6% | 63.8% | 34.4% |
| 20 | 2003 | 87/89 | 11.1 | 2.1 | 61.8% | 80.6% | 58.7% | 63.1% | 44.2% | 72.2% | 37.3% | 2004 | 56/56 | 4.8 | 3.2 | 66.0% | 71.0% | 56.3% | 65.5% | 40.6% | 65.7% | 37.3% |
| 21 | 2004 | 81/84 | 12.6 | 2.3 | 63.6% | 81.2% | 56.9% | 69.8% | 42.3% | 72.3% | 38.0% | 2005 | 61/61 | 6.6 | 3.7 | 65.1% | 72.5% | 51.7% | 60.0% | 44.5% | 65.2% | 38.9% |
| 22 | 2005 | 69/70 | 13.2 | 1.9 | 65.7% | 82.6% | 58.1% | 70.6% | 44.9% | 74.1% | 36.7% | 2006 | 56/56 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 72.5% | 68.7% | 49.7% | 62.8% | 43.6% | 63.3% | 38.3% |
| 23 | 2006 | 62/63 | 11.4 | 1.5 | 66.8% | 79.9% | 56.0% | 70.1% | 46.0% | 71.9% | 38.3% | 2007 | 59/59 | 4.6 | 3.4 | 72.4% | 70.2% | 52.2% | 55.3% | 38.6% | 65.1% | 38.2% |
| 24 | 2007 | 64/64 | 11.7 | 1.5 | 64.3% | 80.8% | 57.2% | 65.2% | 42.0% | 72.4% | 34.1% | 2008 | 72/72 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 72.6% | 69.3% | 53.0% | 55.6% | 47.6% | 64.7% | 40.8% |
| 25 | 2008 | 62/63 | 14.3 | 2.1 | 67.2% | 78.4% | 56.0% | 65.8% | 39.5% | 71.1% | 36.0% | 2009 | 75/75 | 6.1 | 3.7 | 69.1% | 73.1% | 54.3% | 62.2% | 46.5% | 67.1% | 41.1% |
| 26 | 2009 | 61/62 | 12.5 | 1.4 | 69.8% | 79.4% | 58.6% | 61.6% | 40.3% | 73.0% | 36.4% | 2010 | 64/64 | 5.4 | 4.8 | 67.1% | 71.2% | 49.4% | 60.0% | 44.6% | 64.0% | 40.3% |
| 27 | 2010 | 66/66 | 12.3 | 1.5 | 68.7% | 79.6% | 59.2% | 67.2% | 37.4% | 73.0% | 35.2% | 2011 | 58/58 | 5.5 | 3.9 | 68.8% | 70.7% | 51.3% | 61.5% | 44.9% | 64.6% | 38.1% |
| 28 | 2011 | 47/47 | 12.1 | 2.0 | 65.2% | 76.9% | 56.5% | 62.5% | 44.0% | 69.7% | 36.3% | 2012 | 53/54 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 69.7% | 69.7% | 51.4% | 64.4% | 42.1% | 64.1% | 38.3% |
| 29 | 2012 | 34/36 | 10.1 | 1.9 | 66.4% | 75.8% | 56.1% | 64.8% | 37.1% | 69.2% | 35.1% | 2013 | 50/51 | 5.9 | 5.0 | 61.7% | 72.8% | 54.0% | 56.4% | 36.3% | 65.3% | 37.4% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 46/46 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 66.3% | 71.7% | 51.8% | 65.6% | 43.2% | 64.5% | 37.3% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 50/50 | 7.7 | 4.1 | 64.6% | 73.5% | 52.3% | 60.8% | 35.2% | 66.1% | 35.3% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 55/55 | 6.3 | 3.9 | 64.0% | 73.2% | 51.4% | 62.1% | 38.4% | 65.1% | 37.8% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 54/54 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 69.0% | 70.6% | 51.0% | 53.7% | 45.7% | 64.6% | 39.5% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 61/61 | 6.7 | 4.2 | 63.1% | 72.0% | 48.7% | 59.3% | 42.9% | 63.4% | 39.0% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 53/53 | 7.7 | 3.7 | 63.8% | 71.8% | 49.4% | 62.4% | 40.0% | 63.7% | 36.0% |
| 36 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 13/13 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 67.5% | 68.9% | 49.5% | 59.7% | 29.5% | 62.7% | 36.4% |
| 37 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10/10 | 3.9 | 3.2 | 66.9% | 60.7% | 48.4% | 54.2% | 28.3% | 56.6% | 35.0% |
| 38 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 16/16 | 4.3 | 2.9 | 63.4% | 66.0% | 48.6% | 58.4% | 37.6% | 59.8% | 36.2% |
| 39 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5/5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 62.6% | 53.7% | 32.4% | 36.3% | 45.3% | 45.6% | 34.0% |
| Career | — | 752/778 | 11.8 | 2.0 | 64.8% | 79.8% | 57.2% | 66.1% | 41.8% | 71.8% | 36.5% | — | 988/991 | 5.5 | 3.9 | 67.3% | 70.9% | 51.6% | 59.9% | 42.1% | 64.4% | 38.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2000 | 1562 | 130.0 | +2.92 | -1.89 | 1.051 | 50.8% | +7 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.29 | 1–0 | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 1854 | 151.7 | +6.98 | -0.04 | 1.246 | 53.2% | -50 | -84 | -182 | 70.6% | +1.13 | 7–8 (47%) | 20–11 (65%) | — | +0.34 | 2002 | 1502 | 102.0 | -2.56 | -2.05 | 0.736 | 44.2% | — | +27 | — | 28.6% | -1.72 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 19 | 2002 | 1922 | 150.3 | +6.65 | +0.05 | 1.243 | 53.3% | -11 | -76 | -241 | 67.9% | +1.02 | 11–3 (79%) | 16–11 (59%) | — | +1.39 | 2003 | 1592 | 125.8 | +1.64 | -0.91 | 0.950 | 48.7% | +9 | -89 | — | 39.6% | -0.77 | 2–4 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -0.48 |
| 20 | 2003 | 2091 | 158.5 | +9.31 | +1.00 | 1.343 | 54.4% | -9 | -246 | -131 | 73.2% | +1.35 | 17–5 (77%) | 35–20 (64%) | — | -0.15 | 2004 | 1731 | 140.6 | +2.76 | +0.54 | 1.085 | 51.4% | -84 | +24 | -92 | 53.2% | +0.29 | 6–8 (43%) | 11–12 (48%) | — | -1.34 |
| 21 | 2004 | 2068 | 162.3 | +8.68 | +2.20 | 1.370 | 54.4% | +33 | -249 | +34 | 76.8% | +1.43 | 11–6 (65%) | 35–10 (78%) | — | -0.37 | 2005 | 1791 | 146.9 | +2.51 | +2.36 | 1.116 | 51.9% | -27 | +11 | -149 | 55.1% | +0.46 | 10–12 (45%) | 12–11 (52%) | — | -2.07 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2037 | 158.9 | +9.75 | +0.54 | 1.415 | 54.5% | +35 | -205 | +243 | 73.3% | +1.41 | 15–6 (71%) | 26–21 (55%) | — | -0.17 | 2006 | 1727 | 137.0 | +0.96 | +1.48 | 1.042 | 50.6% | -72 | +110 | +30 | 56.5% | +0.19 | 10–10 (50%) | 14–10 (58%) | — | +0.48 |
| 23 | 2006 | 2009 | 154.0 | +8.35 | +1.30 | 1.362 | 54.5% | +43 | -198 | +195 | 70.4% | +1.39 | 11–7 (61%) | 16–17 (48%) | — | +3.03 | 2007 | 1864 | 150.9 | +2.40 | +2.23 | 1.097 | 51.3% | -58 | -13 | -91 | 54.4% | +0.38 | 11–10 (52%) | 10–14 (42%) | — | -1.77 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2010 | 157.9 | +8.22 | -1.05 | 1.237 | 53.0% | +51 | -248 | +218 | 70.9% | +1.07 | 7–2 (78%) | 29–12 (71%) | — | +1.00 | 2008 | 1876 | 151.0 | +1.44 | +3.82 | 1.154 | 52.4% | -51 | +93 | +36 | 58.0% | +0.69 | 13–9 (59%) | 13–14 (48%) | — | +1.79 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2007 | 161.4 | +7.15 | +0.61 | 1.248 | 53.2% | +42 | -189 | +148 | 69.0% | +1.19 | 14–7 (67%) | 23–17 (58%) | — | +0.50 | 2009 | 2004 | 172.3 | +4.14 | +5.15 | 1.247 | 53.9% | +20 | +44 | -100 | 66.0% | +1.22 | 11–12 (48%) | 15–19 (44%) | — | -0.23 |
| 26 | 2009 | 2045 | 166.9 | +8.85 | +1.67 | 1.350 | 54.2% | +9 | -178 | +250 | 72.2% | +1.21 | 8–7 (53%) | 32–11 (74%) | — | -0.24 | 2010 | 1928 | 161.5 | +1.35 | +3.83 | 1.119 | 52.0% | +11 | +172 | — | 59.1% | +0.69 | 18–5 (78%) | 17–17 (50%) | — | +1.41 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1991 | 164.1 | +8.60 | +0.23 | 1.305 | 53.4% | +45 | -129 | +236 | 67.5% | +0.97 | 11–7 (61%) | 23–17 (58%) | — | +2.84 | 2011 | 1931 | 156.9 | +1.76 | +2.02 | 1.077 | 51.0% | -19 | +115 | -49 | 55.4% | +0.39 | 9–9 (50%) | 9–10 (47%) | — | -0.03 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2025 | 162.2 | +5.97 | +0.87 | 1.200 | 52.6% | +41 | — | +182 | 63.9% | +0.83 | 7–3 (70%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | +0.24 | 2012 | 1902 | 158.3 | +1.78 | +1.64 | 1.068 | 50.9% | -15 | +110 | -16 | 57.3% | +0.45 | 7–6 (54%) | 10–11 (48%) | — | +0.32 |
| 29 | 2012 | 1991 | 148.1 | +4.71 | -0.49 | 1.139 | 52.1% | +25 | — | +178 | 60.7% | +0.44 | 7–3 (70%) | 12–9 (57%) | — | -0.02 | 2013 | 1897 | 150.8 | +1.90 | +1.27 | 1.077 | 50.9% | -69 | +47 | +113 | 54.3% | +0.20 | 11–12 (48%) | 14–10 (58%) | — | -0.19 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1880 | 147.7 | +0.99 | +0.74 | 1.048 | 50.8% | -58 | +69 | +74 | 55.4% | +0.36 | 11–12 (48%) | 12–16 (43%) | — | +1.67 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1822 | 158.0 | +2.13 | -0.07 | 1.043 | 50.6% | -12 | +53 | +115 | 47.4% | +0.18 | 12–11 (52%) | 13–16 (45%) | — | -2.42 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1823 | 157.6 | +1.70 | +1.52 | 1.083 | 51.2% | -31 | +108 | +59 | 53.3% | +0.30 | 6–12 (33%) | 15–12 (56%) | — | -1.95 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1896 | 164.3 | +0.98 | +3.38 | 1.115 | 51.7% | -12 | +46 | -99 | 55.4% | +0.30 | 6–15 (29%) | 18–9 (67%) | — | -2.48 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1915 | 159.9 | -0.10 | +2.46 | 1.065 | 50.9% | +25 | +13 | -172 | 51.9% | +0.27 | 15–11 (58%) | 8–17 (32%) | — | -1.33 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1810 | 151.6 | -0.18 | +0.45 | 0.990 | 50.1% | +22 | +37 | +5 | 51.4% | +0.28 | 13–13 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | — | -0.47 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1768 | 132.5 | -0.34 | -1.01 | 0.975 | 49.0% | +72 | — | — | 48.5% | -0.27 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–0 | — | -0.38 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1627 | 114.6 | -2.83 | -1.10 | 0.807 | 46.0% | — | +81 | — | 25.0% | -1.25 | — | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.25 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1604 | 122.9 | -3.29 | -0.30 | 0.900 | 48.1% | +74 | +90 | — | 36.6% | -0.81 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +0.75 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1536 | 96.8 | -6.12 | -1.90 | 0.625 | 40.2% | +105 | — | — | 9.1% | -3.27 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.03 |
| Career | — | 2176 | 164.1 | +7.98 | +0.64 | 1.296 | 53.7% | +22 | -172 | +108 | 70.1% | +1.15 | 127–64 (66%) | 280–166 (63%) | 109.2 | +1.03 | — | 2128 | 158.8 | +1.50 | +2.00 | 1.077 | 51.2% | -17 | +67 | -9 | 54.3% | +0.35 | 175–178 (50%) | 214–226 (49%) | 97.0 | -0.90 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 3 | 21 | 24 | Mar 26, 2012 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 7 | 7 | 14 | Jan 19, 2012 | H2H |
| Tommy Haas | 6 | 7 | 13 | Nov 3, 2011 | H2H |
| James Blake | 9 | 3 | 12 | Aug 22, 2012 | H2H |
| Andy Murray | 4 | 8 | 12 | Nov 11, 2011 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | 7 | 15 | 22 | Jul 22, 2017 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 3 | 17 | 20 | May 18, 2019 | H2H |
| Andy Murray | 4 | 13 | 17 | Oct 15, 2020 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 5 | 10 | 15 | Jan 20, 2019 | H2H |
| Tomas Berdych | 4 | 11 | 15 | Jan 3, 2019 | H2H |