H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Andy Roddick vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 2-2
Andy Roddick and Guillermo Canas are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2004 US Open third round 6-1 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-1 6-3 6-3 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| May 5, 2004* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 7-6(7) 6-1 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2004* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-3 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2002* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Guillermo Canas | 6-4 7-5 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |