H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Andy Roddick vs Harel Levy H2H: 1-1
Andy Roddick and Harel Levy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Harel Levy leads 1–0 on grass, while Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Harel Levy won the 2001 Nottingham semifinal 7-6(3) 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2001* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Harel Levy | 7-6(3) 5-7 6-3 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2001* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-2 | Harel Levy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
| Harel Levy | #1,024 | #30 | 1,023 | 1,732 | 43 | 83 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Harel Levy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 | 2000 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 | 2001 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 | 2002 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 | 2003 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #111 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #247 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |