H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andy Roddick vs Igor Andreev H2H: 3-2

Andy Roddick holds a 3–2 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2010 Miami Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 43 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 27, 2010* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Andy Roddick #8 6-4 6-4 Igor Andreev #40 Match data
Aug 13, 2009* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Andy Roddick #5 6-1 7-6(3) Igor Andreev #28 Match data
May 30, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Igor Andreev #125 3-6 6-4 6-3 6-4 Andy Roddick #3 Match data
Mar 11, 2006* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Igor Andreev #26 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 Andy Roddick #3 Match data
Jun 26, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Andy Roddick #4 6-2 6-2 7-6(4) Igor Andreev #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andy Roddick #40 #1 5,800 2,177 577 196 74.6% 1 5 0 4 22 32
Igor Andreev #1,011 #18 2,490 1,913 219 214 50.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andy Roddick Igor Andreev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 4–5 44.4% #156 1,561 0 0
18 2001 39–16 70.9% #14 1,855 0 3
19 2002 51–19 72.9% #10 1,923 0 5 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0
20 2003 71–18 79.8% #1 2,092 1 11 2004 25–26 49.0% #50 1,660 0 0
21 2004 66–15 81.5% #2 2,078 1 15 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,832 0 3
22 2005 56–14 80.0% #3 2,031 1 20 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,760 0 3
23 2006 46–17 73.0% #6 1,998 1 21 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3
24 2007 48–16 75.0% #6 2,009 1 23 2008 38–27 58.5% #19 1,882 0 3
25 2008 47–16 74.6% #8 2,008 1 26 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,693 0 3
26 2009 47–15 75.8% #7 2,046 1 27 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3
27 2010 48–18 72.7% #8 1,988 1 29 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3
28 2011 32–15 68.1% #14 2,024 1 30 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3
29 2012 22–12 64.7% #39 1,987 1 32 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3