H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andy Roddick vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 6-2

Andy Roddick holds a 6–2 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 6–1 on hard courts, while Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2007 Rome Masters fourth round 6-0 6-4.

USA Age 43 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
ARG Age 46 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2007* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Juan Ignacio Chela #23 6-0 6-4 Andy Roddick #3 Match data
Aug 19, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Andy Roddick #12 6-3 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #35 Match data
Aug 20, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Andy Roddick #5 7-6(4) 6-2 Juan Ignacio Chela #56 Match data
Aug 5, 2005* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard Andy Roddick #5 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #47 Match data
Jul 31, 2004* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Andy Roddick #2 6-1 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #17 Match data
Aug 7, 2003* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Andy Roddick #7 7-6(6) 6-2 Juan Ignacio Chela #36 Match data
Sep 4, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Andy Roddick #11 5-7 6-4 6-4 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #24 Match data
Mar 20, 2002* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #37 6-3 2-6 6-4 Andy Roddick #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andy Roddick #40 #1 5,800 2,177 577 196 74.6% 1 5 0 4 22 32
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,909 306 268 53.3% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andy Roddick Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 4–5 44.4% #156 1,561 0 0
18 2001 39–16 70.9% #14 1,855 0 3
19 2002 51–19 72.9% #10 1,923 0 5 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 2003 71–18 79.8% #1 2,092 1 11 2000 13–15 46.4% #63 1,540 0 1
21 2004 66–15 81.5% #2 2,078 1 15 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,594 0 1
22 2005 56–14 80.0% #3 2,031 1 20 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,783 0 2
23 2006 46–17 73.0% #6 1,998 1 21 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 2007 48–16 75.0% #6 2,009 1 23 2004 33–25 56.9% #26 1,735 0 3
25 2008 47–16 74.6% #8 2,008 1 26 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,691 0 3
26 2009 47–15 75.8% #7 2,046 1 27 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,721 0 3
27 2010 48–18 72.7% #8 1,988 1 29 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,796 0 4
28 2011 32–15 68.1% #14 2,024 1 30 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 2012 22–12 64.7% #39 1,987 1 32 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,835 0 6
31 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,634 0 6