H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andy Roddick vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 7-7
Andy Roddick and Lleyton Hewitt are tied 7–7 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 6–4 on hard courts, while Andy Roddick leads 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2012 Australian Open second round 3-6 6-3 6-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7
–
7
14 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 3-6 6-3 6-4 (ret.) | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2011* | Memphis | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andy Roddick | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Jul 2, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-7(10) 7-6(1) 4-6 6-4 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2009* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Andy Roddick | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2009* | Memphis | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Andy Roddick | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Sep 8, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 7-5 6-4 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2005* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-4 7-6(4) | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2005* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 7-6(2) 6-7(3) 7-6(4) | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Jan 30, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) 6-1 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Nov 22, 2004* | Masters Cup | ATP Finals | SF | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 6-3 6-2 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2004* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Andy Roddick | 7-6(7) 6-3 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Sep 7, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Lleyton Hewitt | 6-7(6) 6-4 2-2 (ret.) | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2001* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 6-3 6-2 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
| Lleyton Hewitt | #636 | #1 | 5,205 | 2,159 | 564 | 241 | 70.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 30 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Lleyton Hewitt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #100 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 53–15 | 77.9% | #7 | 1,993 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 | 2001 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #1 | 2,116 | 1 | 12 |
| 21 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 | 2002 | 61–16 | 79.2% | #1 | 2,062 | 2 | 17 |
| 22 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 | 2003 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #17 | 1,939 | 2 | 19 |
| 23 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 | 2004 | 64–16 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,076 | 2 | 23 |
| 24 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 | 2005 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 24 |
| 25 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 | 2006 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #20 | 1,964 | 2 | 25 |
| 26 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 | 2007 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #21 | 1,925 | 2 | 26 |
| 27 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 | 2008 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #67 | 1,936 | 2 | 26 |
| 28 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 | 2009 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #22 | 1,956 | 2 | 27 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 | 2010 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #54 | 1,907 | 2 | 28 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #186 | 1,817 | 2 | 28 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #83 | 1,867 | 2 | 28 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,884 | 2 | 28 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,841 | 2 | 30 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,715 | 2 | 30 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #633 | 1,727 | 2 | 30 |