H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andy Roddick vs Noam Okun H2H: 1-0
Andy Roddick holds a 1–0 lead over Noam Okun in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2005 Indianapolis fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2005 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-3 | Noam Okun | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
| Noam Okun | #1,046 | #95 | 411 | 1,628 | 20 | 43 | 31.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Noam Okun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #128 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #194 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #431 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |