H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andy Roddick vs Pete Sampras H2H: 2-1
Andy Roddick holds a 2–1 lead over Pete Sampras in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2002 US Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Pete Sampras | 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2002* | Houston | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Andy Roddick | 7-6(9) 6-3 | Pete Sampras | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2001* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Pete Sampras | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
| Pete Sampras | #34 | #1 | 5,792 | 2,265 | 737 | 208 | 78.0% | 14 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 64 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Pete Sampras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #81 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 19 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 52–17 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,091 | 1 | 8 |
| 20 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #3 | 2,118 | 1 | 13 |
| 21 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 | 1993 | 82–15 | 84.5% | #1 | 2,126 | 3 | 21 |
| 22 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 | 1994 | 74–9 | 89.2% | #1 | 2,196 | 5 | 31 |
| 23 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 | 1995 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #1 | 2,134 | 7 | 36 |
| 24 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 | 1996 | 66–10 | 86.8% | #1 | 2,183 | 8 | 44 |
| 25 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 | 1997 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #1 | 2,187 | 10 | 52 |
| 26 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 | 1998 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #1 | 2,042 | 11 | 56 |
| 27 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 | 1999 | 38–9 | 80.9% | #3 | 2,117 | 12 | 61 |
| 28 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 | 2000 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,068 | 13 | 63 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 | 2001 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #10 | 2,003 | 13 | 63 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #13 | 1,977 | 14 | 64 |