H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Andy Roddick vs Tim Henman H2H: 2-3

Tim Henman holds a 3–2 lead over Andy Roddick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2004 ATP Finals round robin 7-5 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andy Roddick
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andy Roddick #2 7-5 7-6(6) Tim Henman #7 Match data Nov 15, 2004 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Tim Henman #10 6-7(6) 7-6(1) 6-3 Andy Roddick #3 Match data Mar 14, 2004* QF Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tim Henman #31 7-6(4) 7-6(7) Andy Roddick #2 Match data Nov 2, 2003* SF Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Andy Roddick #4 6-3 7-6(2) 6-3 Tim Henman #33 Match data Aug 27, 2003* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tim Henman #38 1-6 6-3 7-6(1) Andy Roddick #6 Match data Aug 2, 2003* SF Washington Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andy Roddick #40 #1 5,800 2,175 580 198 74.6% 1 5 0 5 21 32
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andy Roddick Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 4–5 44.4% #156 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 39–16 70.9% #14 1,854 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 2002 51–19 72.9% #10 1,922 0 5 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2003 71–18 79.8% #1 2,091 1 11 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 2004 68–16 81.0% #2 2,068 1 15 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 2005 56–14 80.0% #3 2,036 1 20 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2006 46–17 73.0% #6 2,008 1 21 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2007 48–16 75.0% #6 2,009 1 23 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 2008 47–16 74.6% #8 2,007 1 26 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 2009 47–15 75.8% #7 2,045 1 27 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 2010 48–18 72.7% #8 1,990 1 29 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 2011 32–15 68.1% #14 2,025 1 30 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2012 23–13 63.9% #39 1,990 1 32 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andy Roddick Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 20 10 30 66.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 32 11 43 74.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2003 44 10 54 81.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 10 1 11 90.9% 6 2 8 75.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2004 51 11 62 82.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 2005 29 9 38 76.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 1 12 91.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 2006 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2007 36 11 47 76.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 2008 38 12 50 76.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2009 33 11 44 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2010 42 15 57 73.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2011 27 11 38 71.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2012 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 407 137 544 74.8% 67 29 96 69.8% 83 22 105 79.0% 23 10 33 69.7% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 752/778 of Andy Roddick's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andy Roddick Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2000 7/9 7.4 2.1 56.8% 76.4% 57.4% 61.0% 37.5% 68.5% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 50/55 10.4 3.6 58.9% 80.0% 57.0% 66.5% 37.5% 70.3% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 62/70 9.0 2.6 61.4% 79.8% 54.3% 64.2% 43.5% 70.0% 37.3% 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 2003 87/89 11.1 2.1 61.8% 80.6% 58.7% 63.1% 44.2% 72.2% 37.3% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 2004 81/84 12.6 2.3 63.6% 81.2% 56.9% 69.8% 42.3% 72.3% 38.0% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 2005 69/70 13.2 1.9 65.7% 82.6% 58.1% 70.6% 44.9% 74.1% 36.7% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 2006 62/63 11.4 1.5 66.8% 79.9% 56.0% 70.1% 46.0% 71.9% 38.3% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 2007 64/64 11.7 1.5 64.3% 80.8% 57.2% 65.2% 42.0% 72.4% 34.1% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 2008 62/63 14.3 2.1 67.2% 78.4% 56.0% 65.8% 39.5% 71.1% 36.0% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 2009 61/62 12.5 1.4 69.8% 79.4% 58.6% 61.6% 40.3% 73.0% 36.4% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 2010 66/66 12.3 1.5 68.7% 79.6% 59.2% 67.2% 37.4% 73.0% 35.2% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 2011 47/47 12.1 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 56.5% 62.5% 44.0% 69.7% 36.3% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 2012 34/36 10.1 1.9 66.4% 75.8% 56.1% 64.8% 37.1% 69.2% 35.1% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
Career — 752/778 11.8 2.0 64.8% 79.8% 57.2% 66.1% 41.8% 71.8% 36.5% — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andy Roddick Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1562 130.0 +2.92 -1.89 1.051 50.8% +7 — — 42.9% -0.29 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1854 151.7 +6.98 -0.04 1.246 53.2% -50 -84 -182 70.6% +1.13 7–8 (47%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1922 150.3 +6.65 +0.05 1.243 53.3% -11 -76 -241 67.9% +1.02 11–3 (79%) 16–11 (59%) — +1.39 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 2003 2091 158.5 +9.31 +1.00 1.343 54.4% -9 -246 -131 73.2% +1.35 17–5 (77%) 35–20 (64%) — -0.15 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04
21 2004 2068 162.3 +8.68 +2.20 1.370 54.4% +33 -249 +34 76.8% +1.43 11–6 (65%) 35–10 (78%) — -0.37 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81
22 2005 2037 158.9 +9.75 +0.54 1.415 54.5% +35 -205 +243 73.3% +1.41 15–6 (71%) 26–21 (55%) — -0.17 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85
23 2006 2009 154.0 +8.35 +1.30 1.362 54.5% +43 -198 +195 70.4% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 16–17 (48%) — +3.03 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62
24 2007 2010 157.9 +8.22 -1.05 1.237 53.0% +51 -248 +218 70.9% +1.07 7–2 (78%) 29–12 (71%) — +1.00 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72
25 2008 2007 161.4 +7.15 +0.61 1.248 53.2% +42 -189 +148 69.0% +1.19 14–7 (67%) 23–17 (58%) — +0.50 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25
26 2009 2045 166.9 +8.85 +1.67 1.350 54.2% +9 -178 +250 72.2% +1.21 8–7 (53%) 32–11 (74%) — -0.24 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30
27 2010 1991 164.1 +8.60 +0.23 1.305 53.4% +45 -129 +236 67.5% +0.97 11–7 (61%) 23–17 (58%) — +2.84 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21
28 2011 2025 162.2 +5.97 +0.87 1.200 52.6% +41 — +182 63.9% +0.83 7–3 (70%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.24 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72
29 2012 1991 148.1 +4.71 -0.49 1.139 52.1% +25 — +178 60.7% +0.44 7–3 (70%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.02 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06
Career — 2176 164.1 +7.98 +0.64 1.296 53.7% +22 -172 +108 70.1% +1.15 127–64 (66%) 280–166 (63%) 109.2 +1.03 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.