H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Antonio Zugarelli vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 2-1
Antonio Zugarelli holds a 2–1 lead over Ion Tiriac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Antonio Zugarelli leads 2–0 on clay, while Ion Tiriac leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Antonio Zugarelli won the 1977 Aix En Provence third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1977* | Aix En Provence | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Antonio Zugarelli | 6-2 6-2 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1974* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Antonio Zugarelli | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ion Tiriac | 6-4 6-2 5-7 7-5 | Antonio Zugarelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Zugarelli | #827 | #24 | 0 | 1,788 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antonio Zugarelli | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #107 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #135 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #287 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |