H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Antonio Zugarelli vs Mark Cox H2H: 1-1
Antonio Zugarelli and Mark Cox are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Antonio Zugarelli won the 1978 Rotterdam Wct third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1978* | Rotterdam Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Antonio Zugarelli | 6-1 6-4 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1976* | London | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Mark Cox | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Antonio Zugarelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Zugarelli | #827 | #24 | 0 | 1,788 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antonio Zugarelli | Mark Cox | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1976 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1977 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1978 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #107 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #135 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #287 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 |