H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Antonio Zugarelli vs Patrick Proisy H2H: 1-3

Patrick Proisy holds a 3–1 lead over Antonio Zugarelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patrick Proisy leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Antonio Zugarelli won the 1980 Florence round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Antonio Zugarelli
ITA Age 76 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Patrick Proisy
FRA Age 76 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Antonio Zugarelli 4-6 6-3 6-4 Patrick Proisy #82 Match data May 15, 1980* R32 Florence ATP 250 Clay
Patrick Proisy #43 6-4 3-6 6-3 Antonio Zugarelli #48 Match data May 17, 1978* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay
Patrick Proisy 6-4 6-4 Antonio Zugarelli Match data Apr 28, 1973* QF Madrid ATP 250 Clay
Patrick Proisy 6-2 6-3 Antonio Zugarelli Match data Apr 21, 1971* R32 Palermo ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Antonio Zugarelli #827 #24 0 1,821 112 150 42.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Patrick Proisy #232 #23 0 1,876 222 196 53.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Antonio Zugarelli Patrick Proisy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1968 1–4 20.0% — 1,454 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1969 8–9 47.1% — 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1970 0–3 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
21 1971 3–7 30.0% — 1,483 0 0 1971 27–18 60.0% — 1,719 0 0
22 1972 8–11 42.1% — 1,551 0 0 1972 36–21 63.2% — 1,727 0 0
23 1973 14–17 45.2% #69 1,608 0 0 1973 32–22 59.3% #41 1,770 0 0
24 1974 14–20 41.2% #73 1,589 0 0 1974 15–22 40.5% #69 1,670 0 0
25 1975 7–14 33.3% #90 1,592 0 0 1975 24–17 58.5% #43 1,764 0 0
26 1976 20–16 55.6% #30 1,710 0 1 1976 14–15 48.3% #104 1,679 0 0
27 1977 20–15 57.1% #44 1,698 0 1 1977 25–18 58.1% #44 1,772 0 1
28 1978 10–17 37.0% #107 1,649 0 1 1978 12–12 50.0% #96 1,730 0 1
29 1979 6–14 30.0% #135 1,615 0 1 1979 14–13 51.9% #93 1,684 0 1
30 1980 5–8 38.5% #128 1,623 0 1 1980 11–16 40.7% #158 1,621 0 1
31 1981 2–4 33.3% — 1,582 0 1 1981 3–6 33.3% — 1,565 0 1
32 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,526 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1983 0–1 0.0% #267 1,516 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Antonio Zugarelli Patrick Proisy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1968 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1971 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1971 4 4 8 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1972 6 4 10 60.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1973 1 2 3 33.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1973 1 3 4 25.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1974 1 4 5 20.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1974 4 5 9 44.4% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0%
25 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 24 15 39 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 1977 — — — — 20 12 32 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 24 17 41 58.5% — — — — — — — —
28 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 8 12 33.3% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — —
29 1979 1 5 6 16.7% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1979 0 3 3 0.0% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — —
30 1980 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 4 2 6 66.7% 6 12 18 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1981 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
32 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 5 17 22 22.7% 87 89 176 49.4% 6 15 21 28.6% 14 29 43 32.6% — 23 28 51 45.1% 164 129 293 56.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 10 15 25 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Antonio Zugarelli Patrick Proisy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1968 1484 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03 1968 1455 96.4 — — — — — — — 10.0% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.46
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1504 114.5 — — — — — +51 +6 48.7% -0.13 0–4 (0%) — — -0.31
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1475 103.1 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.56 — — — -0.27
21 1971 1483 106.4 — — — — — +25 — 33.3% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.29 1971 1719 138.7 — — — — -176 +66 -189 59.2% +0.70 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.87
22 1972 1551 115.9 — — — — — 0 +18 41.2% -0.74 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.11 1972 1727 135.4 — — — — -76 +206 -140 61.0% +0.94 9–8 (53%) 5–9 (36%) — +2.17
23 1973 1609 127.0 — — — — -42 +44 -69 50.0% -0.07 4–7 (36%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.13 1973 1771 139.5 — — — — -85 +42 +8 59.9% +0.50 3–9 (25%) 10–4 (71%) — +1.32
24 1974 1589 128.5 — — — — +15 +63 — 45.0% -0.40 3–9 (25%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.73 1974 1670 129.2 — — — — -15 +62 +71 46.2% -0.18 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.86
25 1975 1593 114.5 — — — — -20 +71 — 38.0% -0.88 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — +1.30 1975 1765 142.4 — — — — — +60 — 53.3% +0.49 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.52
26 1976 1710 133.8 — — — — -107 +43 — 51.1% -0.03 9–4 (69%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.87 1976 1680 132.0 — — — — — +32 0 50.0% +0.28 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.81
27 1977 1698 132.8 — — — — — +78 — 58.5% +0.76 6–4 (60%) 5–6 (45%) — +2.83 1977 1773 134.5 — — — — — +9 — 55.4% +0.44 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) — +2.04
28 1978 1649 128.3 — — — — -70 +87 -196 40.0% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.67 1978 1730 128.5 — — — — -120 +32 — 53.3% +0.15 5–6 (45%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.58
29 1979 1615 127.5 — — — — -107 +105 — 37.0% -1.13 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.61 1979 1685 129.7 — — — — -133 +67 — 57.1% +0.32 0–7 (0%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.95
30 1980 1623 123.9 — — — — — +72 — 37.9% -0.62 1–0 — — +0.25 1980 1622 131.3 — — — — -2 +9 — 43.1% +0.03 6–6 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.51
31 1981 1582 106.9 — — — — — +59 — 38.5% -0.85 1–1 — — +0.69 1981 1565 102.1 — — — — — +27 — 31.6% -1.42 0–1 2–0 — +1.38
32 1982 1527 103.1 — — — — — +92 — 47.4% -0.16 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) — +2.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1983 1516 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1821 132.0 — — — — -47 +60 -53 45.2% -0.38 32–47 (41%) 28–26 (52%) 98.8 +3.30 — 1877 139.3 — — — — -67 +55 -71 53.6% +0.33 48–71 (40%) 42–42 (50%) 92.8 +2.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.