H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Antonio Zugarelli vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 0-2
Pavel Slozil holds a 2–0 lead over Antonio Zugarelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pavel Slozil leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pavel Slozil won the 1981 Florence fourth round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1981* | Florence | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Pavel Slozil | 7-5 7-5 | Antonio Zugarelli | Match data |
| Nov 22, 1979* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pavel Slozil | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Antonio Zugarelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Zugarelli | #827 | #24 | 0 | 1,788 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antonio Zugarelli | Pavel Slozil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1971 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1976 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1977 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1978 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #107 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #135 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #287 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |