H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC

Antony Dupuis vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 2-0

Antony Dupuis holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Antony Dupuis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Antony Dupuis won the 2002 US Open round of 128 6-3 6-3 4-2 RET.

FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Antony Dupuis #102 6-3 6-3 4-2 (ret.) Andrea Gaudenzi #108 Match data Aug 28, 2002* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Antony Dupuis #90 6-3 6-3 Andrea Gaudenzi #54 Match data Jan 3, 2002* R32 Qatar Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Antony Dupuis #1,333 #57 661 1,686 86 128 40.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Antony Dupuis Andrea Gaudenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0
23 1996 1–1 50.0% #319 1,513 0 0 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,640 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1
26 1999 9–10 47.4% #83 1,583 0 0 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1
27 2000 4–13 23.5% #103 1,526 0 0 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3
28 2001 11–20 35.5% #90 1,557 0 0 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 2002 14–23 37.8% #70 1,549 0 0 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3
30 2003 17–22 43.6% #78 1,598 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2004 17–21 44.7% #79 1,598 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 7–14 33.3% #150 1,607 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 2–2 50.0% #297 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 4–2 66.7% #197 1,617 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Antony Dupuis Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1999 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2000 2 7 9 22.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
28 2001 4 7 11 36.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2002 10 11 21 47.6% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 60 101 40.6% 20 38 58 34.5% 19 22 41 46.3% 6 8 14 42.9% — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 200/214 of Antony Dupuis's and 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Antony Dupuis Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9%
23 1996 2/2 5.0 4.0 48.9% 72.2% 41.9% 50.0% 38.6% 56.5% 36.3% 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4%
26 1999 15/19 8.1 2.8 60.2% 73.4% 52.7% 71.6% 52.0% 65.1% 35.6% 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1%
27 2000 14/17 7.9 2.4 56.7% 70.4% 52.5% 67.4% 33.6% 62.4% 31.3% 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3%
28 2001 27/31 6.7 3.3 58.3% 72.5% 49.9% 60.8% 30.5% 63.3% 34.5% 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0%
29 2002 34/37 6.4 3.2 61.1% 69.7% 49.7% 60.8% 43.5% 61.7% 32.8% 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8%
30 2003 39/39 8.6 2.7 57.7% 72.8% 52.9% 59.6% 35.3% 64.5% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 38/38 7.5 2.4 59.4% 72.9% 52.5% 50.7% 34.9% 64.6% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 21/21 6.3 2.8 56.5% 70.4% 50.8% 62.2% 31.7% 61.7% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 4/4 7.5 1.3 60.1% 70.9% 56.0% 63.2% 44.6% 65.9% 30.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6/6 8.2 1.0 69.0% 74.3% 62.9% 58.7% 31.2% 70.0% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 200/214 7.4 2.7 59.0% 71.9% 51.9% 59.9% 36.8% 63.6% 33.7% — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Antony Dupuis Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) 109.1 +0.33
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) 108.9 -2.78
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 101.1 +0.04
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) 98.5 +0.03
23 1996 1513 100.9 -1.78 -0.98 0.835 46.0% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.05 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 -1.16
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) 106.9 +1.21
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +0.59
26 1999 1583 123.8 +0.84 -1.08 1.019 50.4% +48 — — 46.7% -0.40 3–4 (43%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +0.49 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) 93.4 +0.05
27 2000 1526 117.0 +0.02 -3.25 0.831 47.5% +31 -34 +15 30.2% -1.12 2–3 (40%) 4–7 (36%) 97.1 -0.44 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) 103.8 -2.07
28 2001 1558 119.9 +1.20 -2.02 0.939 48.8% -41 +42 -80 39.8% -0.57 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 103.4 -0.47 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 96.5 -0.26
29 2002 1549 112.7 -1.41 -3.77 0.856 47.6% +14 -41 -100 38.4% -0.87 3–6 (33%) 9–5 (64%) 100.7 +2.11 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 2003 1598 126.0 +1.23 -2.80 0.969 49.5% -12 -74 -78 47.5% -0.23 5–8 (38%) 11–10 (52%) 101.7 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1599 120.8 +0.82 -3.37 0.925 48.6% 0 -85 -10 46.3% -0.46 5–6 (45%) 15–9 (63%) 101.1 +1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1608 116.8 -1.11 -1.52 0.907 48.3% -67 -40 +59 35.4% -0.79 0–3 (0%) 3–6 (33%) 94.0 +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1570 103.4 +0.73 -2.14 0.881 48.7% — — — 28.6% -0.71 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1618 108.8 +0.42 -1.19 1.126 51.9% — — +134 69.2% +0.46 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1580 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2010 1559 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1687 122.0 +0.28 -2.66 0.924 48.7% -3 -38 -7 42.2% -0.57 25–37 (40%) 63–53 (54%) 101.7 +1.85 — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.