H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 1-1
Antony Dupuis and Cecil Mamiit are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Antony Dupuis leads 1–0 on grass, while Cecil Mamiit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cecil Mamiit won the 2002 Copenhagen third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2002* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cecil Mamiit | 6-0 6-3 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Antony Dupuis | 6-4 5-7 6-7(2) 6-3 6-1 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |